Commentary

Video

Dr Narayan on the Utility of Nadofaragene Firadenovec in NMIBC and Beyond

Vikram M. Narayan, MD, discusses the utility of nadofaragene firadenovec in patients with non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer and beyond.

Vikram M. Narayan, MD, assistant professor, Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Winship Cancer Institute; director, Urologic Oncology, Grady Memorial Hospital, discusses key takeaways regarding the utility of nadofaragene firadenovec-vncg (Adstiladrin) in patients with BCG-unresponsive non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).

Following the readout of the final 5-year analysis of a phase 3 trial (NCT02773849) investigating nadofaragene firadenovec in this patient population, understanding how to use this agent in other treatment arenas remains at the forefront of consideration, Narayan says. When considering what the future holds for the use of nadofaragene firadenovec in other patient populations, Narayan states that there is ongoing research exploring the use of this agent in patients with low-grade upper tract urothelial cancer. In this setting, the drug is administered using a balloon catheter to help maintain it in the renal pelvis, he explains.

Additionally, there is interest in using nadofaragene firadenovec in patients with intermediate-risk bladder cancer, specifically in the non–high-risk BCG-unresponsive patient population, where there is significant unmet need, Narayan continues, adding that recurrent low-grade disease is another potential area of interest for the investigation of this agent. Nadofaragene firadenovec is being evaluated in various other urothelial cancer patient populations as well, he emphasizes.

Furthermore, there is a focus on better stratifying patients with high-risk, low-risk, and intermediate-risk disease using biomarkers, Narayan expands. Urinary biomarkers have been studied with the UroAmp test, and data from phase 2 trials with nadofaragene firadenovec were presented at the 2024 AUA Annual Meeting, he elucidates. The goal is to replicate these findings with phase 3 data to further validate them, Narayan notes. This approach will enable future clinical trials to go beyond categorizing patients simply by the presence of carcinoma in situ or papillary disease, allowing for a more detailed understanding of the specific mutations and minimal residual disease levels that are present in each patient, Narayan adds, concluding by saying that this ongoing research will be crucial for identifying which patients are best suited for these treatments.

Related Videos
Julia Rotow, MD, clinical director, Lowe Center for Thoracic Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; assistant professor, medicine, Harvard Medical School
Joshua K. Sabari, MD, assistant professor, Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine; director, High Reliability Organization Initiatives, Perlmutter Cancer Center
Alastair Thompson, BSc, MBChB, MD, FRCS
C. Ola Landgren, MD, PhD
Sara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH
Adam M. Brufsky, MD, PhD, FACP
Justin M. Watts, MD
Sara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH
Leah Backhus, MD, MPH, FACS, professor, University Medical Line, Cardiothoracic Surgery, co-director, Thoracic Surgery Clinical Research Program, associate program director, Thoracic Track, CT Surgery Residency Training Program, Thelma and Henry Doelger Professor of Cardiovascular Surgery, Stanford Medicine; chief, Thoracic Surgery, VA Palo Alto
Roy S. Herbst, MD, PhD, Ensign Professor of Medicine (Medical Oncology), professor, pharmacology, deputy director, Yale Cancer Center; chief, Medical Oncology, director, Center for Thoracic Cancers, Yale Cancer Center and Smilow Cancer Hospital; assistant dean, Translational Research, Yale School of Medicine