Dr. Paulson on the Utility of Liquid Biopsies Versus Tissue Biopsies

Video

R. Steven Paulson, MD, discusses the utility of liquid biopsies versus tissue biopsies.

R. Steven Paulson, MD, physician, Texas Oncology, discusses the utility of liquid biopsies versus tissue biopsies.

Although tissue biopsy remains the gold standard in oncology, there may not be enough available tissue to perform a biopsy, explains Paulson. In these cases, a patient may need to undergo an invasive procedure to retrieve more tissue for testing.

Alternatively, a liquid biopsy may alleviate the need for an invasive procedure since it only requires a blood draw, says Paulson. A positive result with a liquid biopsy is relatively reliable; however, a negative test result should not be considered definitive.

Additionally, the turn-around time for a liquid biopsy is faster than a tissue biopsy. Therefore, if a liquid biopsy is positive, patients can begin targeted therapy earlier. However, the interpretation of liquid biopsies requires some standardization, concludes Paulson.

Related Videos
Ruben Olivares, MD
Scott Kopetz, MD, PhD, FACP
Rita Nanda, MD
Kateryna Fedorov, MD, assistant professor, hematology-oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Lauren E. Nye, MD, breast medical oncologist, clinical medical director, Breast Cancer Prevention, the University of Kansas Cancer Center
Joseph G. Jurcic, MD
Zeynep Eroglu, MD
Jeremy M. Pantin, MD, clinical director, Adult Transplant and Cellular Therapy Program, TriStar Centennial Medical Center, bone marrow transplant physician, Sarah Cannon Research Institute
Maria Hafez, MD, assistant professor, breast and sarcoma medical oncologist, director, Clinical Breast Cancer Research, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University
Zeynep Eroglu, MD