Video

Dr. Seidman on Ixabepilone in Patients With Aggressive Breast Cancer

Andrew D. Seidman, MD, medical oncologist, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, discusses the label indication for ixabepilone (Ixempra) for the treatment of patients with aggressive breast cancer.

Andrew D. Seidman, MD, medical oncologist, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, discusses the label indication for ixabepilone (Ixempra) for the treatment of patients with aggressive breast cancer.

Ixabepilone represents the importance of having microtubule-binding agents available in the treatment paradigm of breast cancer, Seidman says. Earlier evidence of this was seen with therapies such as vincristine and vinblastine, as well as with the integration of taxanes.

Ixabepilone is approved as a single agent on an every 3-week schedule in patients whose disease is resistant to anthracyclines, taxanes, and capecitabine. In a large phase II study examining ixabepilone, the agent demonstrated a 12% response rate in patients and was associated with a significant median progression-free survival.

<<<

View more from the 33rd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference

Newsletter

Stay up to date on the most recent and practice-changing oncology data

Related Videos
Coy Heldermon, MD, PhD
Paul G. Richardson, MD
Kevin Kalinsky, MD, MS, discusses the potential to switch CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR-positive metastatic breast cancer.
Dr Tolaney on Considerations for Adjuvant CDK4/6 Inhibitors in HR+/HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
Icro Meattini, ​MD, an associate professor in the Department of Clinical and Experimental Biomedical Sciences at the University of Florence; as well as a clinical oncologist in the Radiation Oncology Unit in the Oncology Department and head of the Breast Unit and Breast Cancer Multidisciplinary Team at Florence University Hospital
Dr Jagsi on Factors for RT Omission After Breast-Conserving Surgery in Early Breast Cancer
Dr Borgen on the Need for Improved Risk Stratification in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
Dr Coombs on the Challenges in Establishing a Treatment Consensus for Relapsed CLL