Part 1 of ProstACT Meets Primary Safety Objectives
- Lutetium-177 rosopatamab tetraxetan plus SOC therapies met the primary objectives of part 1 of the global phase 3 ProstACT study.
- Topline data showed that the lutetium-177 rosopatamab tetraxetan–containing combinations had an acceptable safety and tolerability profile with no new safety signals in patients with PSMA-positive mCRPC who previously received an ARPI.
- Data from part 1 of ProstACT will be presented to the FDA to seek an investigational new drug amendment to progress part 2 in the US.
How was ProstACT Global designed?
ProstACT enrolled patients with PSMA-positive mCRPC who experienced disease progression following treatment with their first ARPI.2,3 Eligible patients also needed to be at least 18 years old, have an ECOG performance status of 2 or less, and have an estimated life expectancy of at least 6 months.3
Part 1 of ProstACT consisted of a safety and dosimetry lead-in, during which patients received 2 doses of 177Lu rosopatamab tetraxetan at 76 mCi, 14 days apart, in combination with SOC abiraterone, enzalutamide, or docetaxel.2 Part 2, the randomized expansion portion, plans to enroll approximately 490 patients who will be randomly assigned 2:1 to receive an investigational combination or SOC therapy with either an ARPI or docetaxel.
The primary end point in part 1 was safety and tolerability. The primary end point in part 2 is radiographic progression-free survival per blinded independent central review. Secondary end points include overall survival, objective response rate, and time to first symptomatic skeletal event.
What were ProstACT’s additional safety data?
Further safety data showed that no adverse drug-drug interactions were observed with the 177Lu rosopatamab tetraxetan combinations.1 Across all 3 cohorts, the most common any-grade nonhematologic treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) included fatigue (53%), nausea (28%), dry mouth (25%), and diarrhea (22%). The most common any-grade hematologic TEAEs included thrombocytopenia (78%), neutropenia (64%), and anemia (44%).2 These hematologic AEs were in line with the profile expected for the agent class of 177Lu rosopatamab tetraxetan, according to Telix.
In the news release, Telix, the drug’s developer, noted that the study has advanced into part 2 in jurisdictions where the clinical trial has obtained approval from health authorities.1 Data from part 1 will be presented to the FDA to seek an investigational new drug amendment to progress part 2 in the US.
“Despite advances in clinical practice, men with advanced prostate cancer still need improved first- and second-line treatment options,” David N. Cade, MD, group chief medical officer at Telix, added in the release. “These results build on prior findings and highlight the potential for [177Lu rosopatamab tetraxetan], in combination with contemporary SOC, to become a new first-line option for patients facing this aggressive disease. We are encouraged by the data and look forward to engaging with the FDA at the earliest opportunity, while continuing to advance enrollment in part 2 in regions where clinical trial initiation has already been approved.”
References
- ProstACT Global phase 3 study (Part 1) achieves primary objectives. News release. Telix. March 10, 2026. Accessed March 12, 2026. https://telixpharma.com/news-views/prostact-global-phase-3-study-part-1-achieves-primary-objectives/
- TLX591-Tx ProstACT Global phase 3 study (NCT06520345). Part 1 Results: safety and dosimetry. Telix Therapeurics. March 10, 2026. Accessed March 12, 2026. https://telixpharmaceuticals.gcs-web.com/static-files/138e45b1-4092-4ed9-80b8-6114bc56a3ed
- The study of 177Lu-TLX591 plus SOC versus SOC alone in patients with mCRPC (ProstACT Global). ClinicalTrials.gov. Updated July 10, 2025. Accessed March 12, 2026. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06520345