Nivolumab/Ipilimumab Misses OS End Points in Frontline Head and Neck Cancer, But Shows Trend Toward Benefit in Subset

Article

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab did not significantly improve overall survival over the EXTREME regimen in the frontline treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, missing the primary end points of the phase 3 CheckMate-651 trial.

Abderrahim Oukessou, MD

Abderrahim Oukessou, MD

The combination of nivolumab (Opdivo) plus ipilimumab (Yervoy) did not significantly improve overall survival (OS) over the EXTREME regimen comprised of cetuximab (Erbitux), cisplatin/carboplatin, and fluorouracil in the frontline treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, missing the primary end points of the phase 3 CheckMate-651 trial (NCT02741570).1

However, the dual immunotherapy combination did demonstrate a clear, positive trend toward OS in the subset of patients whose tumors had PD-L1 expression of a combined positive score (CPS) of 20 or higher.

Moreover, data regarding the toxicity profile of nivolumab and ipilimumab in the trial proved to align with what had been reported in prior studies examining the agents in patients with solid tumors.

“Numerous studies have shown long-term survival improvements with the [nivolumab] plus [ipilimumab] combination across various tumor types, bringing benefit to patients around the world,” Abderrahim Oukessou, MD, vice president of thoracic cancers and development lead at Bristol Myers Squibb, stated in a press release. “In the CheckMate-651 trial, [nivolumab] plus [ipilimumab] showed a positive OS trend relative to EXTREME in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck whose tumors express PD-L1, despite the control arm performing better than expected based on historical data.”

The multicenter, phase 3 trial enrolled patients with histologically confirmed metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck that is not amenable to curative therapy.2 Patients had to have measurable disease detected by CT or MRI and tumor tissue available for PD-L1 expressing testing. Patients could not have previously received systemic treatment for recurrent or metastatic disease.

If patients had metastatic or recurrent carcinoma of the nasopharynx, squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary, squamous cell carcinoma originating from the skin and salivary glands or non-squamous histologies, they were excluded. Patients with unacceptable hematologic, renal, or hepatic function, or those with active autoimmune disease, type I diabetes, hypothyroidism requiring hormone replacement, active infection, or psychiatric disorder were also not eligible.

Study participants received nivolumab at 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks in combination with ipilimumab at 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks vs the EXTREME regimen in the first-line setting.

The primary end points of the trial included OS in the intent-to-treat population of the trial and OS in those with tumors that expressed PD-L1 with a CPS of 20 or higher. Important secondary end points included OS in patients with PD-L1–expressing tumors at different cut-off values, objective response rate, duration of response, and progression-free survival in all patients and in the subset of those with PD-L1–expressing tumors.

“We are disappointed that these results did not reach statistical significance, and we remain committed to advancing research and supporting patients with this difficult-to-treat cancer,” Oukessou added.

Previously, in 2016, the FDA approved nivolumab for the treatment of patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck following progression on platinum-based chemotherapy.3

The regulatory decision was based on findings from the phase 3 CheckMate-141 trial (NCT02105636), which demonstrated that nivolumab resulted in a median OS of 7.5 months (95% CI, 5.5-9.1) vs 5.1 months (95% CI, 4.0-6.0) with standard, single-agent systemic therapy in the form of methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.51-0.96; P = .01).4 Moreover, the median progression-free survival in the investigative and control arms was 2.0 months (95% CI, 1.9-2.1) and 2.3 months (95% CI, 1.9-3.1), respectively (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.70-1.13; P = .32).

References

  1. Bristol Myers Squibb provides update on CheckMate -651 trial evaluating Opdivo (nivolumab) plus Yervoy (ipilimumab) versus EXTREME regimen as first-line treatment for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. News release. Bristol Myers Squibb. July 16, 2021. Accessed July 16, 2021. https://bit.ly/3krzocg
  2. Study of nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab compared to the standard of care (Extreme regimen) as first line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (CheckMate 651). ClinicalTrials.gov. Updated April 19, 2021. Accessed July 16, 2021. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02741570
  3. Bristol-Myers Squibb’s Opdivo (nivolumab) is the first immuno-oncology treatment to receive FDA approval based on overall survival in head and neck cancer. News release. Bristol Myers Squibb. November 10, 2016. Accessed July 16, 2021. https://bit.ly/3eqLmyJ
  4. Ferris RL, Blumenschein G, Fayette J, et al. Nivolumab for recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(19):1856-1867. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1602252
Related Videos
Deborah J. Wong, MD, PhD
In this fifth episode of OncChats: Leveraging Immunotherapy in GI Malignancies, Toufic Kachaamy, MD, of City of Hope, Sunil Sharma, MD, of City of Hope, and Madappa Kundranda, MD, PhD, of Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, discuss next steps for research, including vaccination strategies, personalized cellular therapies, and more.
In this fourth episode of OncChats: Leveraging Immunotherapy in GI Malignancies, experts discuss research efforts being made with organoids to address existing questions with immunotherapy and the exploration of multimodality approaches to improve outcomes.
In this third episode of OncChats: Leveraging Immunotherapy in GI Malignancies, Toufic Kachaamy, MD, of City of Hope, Sunil Sharma, MD, of City of Hope, and Madappa Kundranda, MD, PhD, of Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, discuss the potential benefits of utilizing immunotherapy approaches earlier on in the disease course.
In this second episode of OncChats: Leveraging Immunotherapy in GI Malignancies, Toufic Kachaamy, MD, of City of Hope, Sunil Sharma, MD, of City of Hope, and Madappa Kundranda, MD, PhD, of Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, explain the challenges faced with preventing or detecting these cancers early and the understanding that is needed to develop effective early detection methods and move the needle forward.
In this first episode of OncChats: Leveraging Immunotherapy in GI Malignancies, Toufic Kachaamy, MD, of City of Hope, Sunil Sharma, MD, of City of Hope, and Madappa Kundranda, MD, PhD, of Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, discuss the potential for early detection multiomic assays and the work that still needs to be done to encourage their widespread use.
Alessandro Villa, DDS, PhD, MPH
Anna Lee, MD, MPH
Julien Hadoux, MD, PhD, medical oncologist, attending physician, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
David Sher, MD