Article

Some Docs Hesitant to Embrace Genomic Tests That Identify Tumor Changes

A physician's confidence level in his genomic knowledge plays a significant role in attitudes towards genomic tests, especially in tests that look for changes in DNA that are taken from patients' tumor samples

Stacy W. Gray, MD, AM

A physician’s confidence level in his genomic knowledge plays a significant role in attitudes towards genomic tests, especially in tests that look for changes in DNA that are taken from patients’ tumor samples, according to research from the Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center (DF/BWCC).

Physicians who are confident in their ability to interpret and explain the findings to patients were more likely to want to prescribe the test and consider using test results when making treatment recommendations while physicians with lower levels of genomic confidence were less likely to offer the testing, according to the research.

Stacy W. Gray, MD, AM, who is the first author of the report, said 42% of responding oncologists approved of telling patients about test results even when their significance for the patient's outlook and treatment is uncertain.

"The fact that we found so much variation in physicians' confidence about their ability to use genetic data at a tertiary care National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center makes us pause and wonder about how confident physicians in the community are about dealing with this," said Gray, a thoracic cancer physician at Dana-Farber. "It begs the question at a national level, how are we going to make sure that this technology for cancer care is adequately delivered?"

The researchers report that 160 medical oncologists, surgeons and radiation oncologists participated in a study that asked participants about their current use of somatic testing (ie, testing patients' tumors for known mutations one at a time), their attitudes about multiplex testing, and their confidence in their ability to understand and use genomic data. The survey did not include a direct test of the physicians' knowledge.

Results of the survey showed that 22% of doctors reported having ‘low confidence’ in their knowledge about genomics. When queried about their knowledge and their ability to make recommendations based on the test results, 14% said they lacked knowledge about how to explain the concepts to patients, and 26% doubted their ability to make treatment recommendations.

Physicians who participated in the survey said they ordered tumor genomic testing for an average of 24% of patients and only 18% of the participants planned to use multiplex tumor testing “infrequently.”

The authors of the study concluded that there is “little consensus” on how physicians plan to use genomics testing for personalized cancer care, and suggest the need for evidence-based guidelines to help doctors determine when testing is indicated.

The study is published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology

Newsletter

Stay up to date on the most recent and practice-changing oncology data

Related Videos
Katherine L. Nathanson, MD
Dr Garrido-Laguna on the Safety of Daraxonrasib in KRAS G12X–Mutated PDAC
Aditya Bardia, MD, MPH, FASCO
Jin-Ji Yang, MD, of Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University
Katherine L. Nathanson, MD
Dr Jabbour on Bleximenib Monotherapy in KMT2A+ or NPM1+ R/R Acute Leukemia
In this episode of OncChats: A Close Look at Clinical Trials in Oncology and Beyond, Dr Carvajal discusses the progress made in cancer clinical trials, with nearly 20,000 trials worldwide and over 80 FDA-approved cancer drugs since 2015, while also noting the challenges posed by the increasing complexity of therapies and trial protocols.
Marcella Ali Kaddoura, MD
Eunice S. Wang, MD
Marcella Ali Kaddoura, MD