Zahi Mitri, MD
The adjuvant setting in HER2-positive breast cancer has become more varied over the past year, most recently with findings of the phase III PERSEPHEONE trial, which showed that 6 months of trastuzumab (Herceptin) was noninferior to the standard 12 months of the HER2-directed agent, supporting a shortened duration of treatment.1
State of the Science Summit™ on Breast Cancer, Zahi Mitri, MD, assistant professor of medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, and chair of the meeting, discussed these adjuvant advances and other emerging trends in the treatment of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.
OncLive: What are some of the key takeaways from your discussion of the evolving treatment landscape in HER2-positive breast cancer?
: The presentation at the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium on the NSABP B-47 trial showed and confirmed that patients who have HER2 amplification are those who benefit from HER2-directed therapy.
In metastatic disease, I touched on the roles of pertuzumab, as well as ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1; Kadcyla), in the management of metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer and went over some of the new agents in development. These are exciting novel anti-HER2 therapies that are coming through the pipeline.
What are your thoughts on the available adjuvant therapies?
The findings from the APHINITY study were statistically significant. However, at this point, we haven't changed much of our treatment. We still use pertuzumab for the indication it was approved—in the neoadjuvant setting for tumors greater than 2 cm or that are node positive.
A big question is, “What to do after these 6 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy? Do you give doxorubicin followed by 4 cycles of dual anti-HER2 therapy?” It's a big unknown. At this point, I’m giving patients 1 year of pertuzumab based on the FDA approval indication and the APHINITY trial. [Sometimes it’s given] as a neoadjuvant treatment and the rest of the time it is given in the adjuvant setting.
As for neratinib, the study was positive and continued to be positive at the 5-year follow up. This was after the first report at 3 years. That study remained positive with a 2% to 3% benefit. Most of the benefit seems to be in the estrogen receptor (ER)–positive subgroup, at around 45%.
... to read the full story