Mothaffar F. Rimawi, MD
HER2-directed agents and chemotherapy have dramatically improved the outlook for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, but researchers are still scratching the surface in understanding the biology of the disease and resistance mechanisms, said Mothaffar F. Rimawi, MD.
, Rimawi, an associate professor and director of Clinical Research at the Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center at Baylor College of Medicine, discussed the current options in HER2-positive breast cancer and shed light on where future research is headed.
OncLive: Could you describe the metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer paradigm?
: The landscape of metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer is evolving very rapidly. It is evolving because of several factors. In the early-stage setting, [there are] increased reports from clinical trials showing benefits from anti-HER2 agents, such as pertuzumab and neratinib (Nerlynx) and, most recently, results from the KATHERINE study on T-DM1. [These agents] are improving patient outcomes in the early-stage setting, but they are also using them in the metastatic setting and moving them earlier. That is likely to affect how those agents are used, if they are used again in the metastatic setting.
The other aspect of it is that there are a number of new agents addressing a new mechanism of action as well as mechanisms of resistance. It is very important that we understand the biology of resistance and then try to develop strategies to overcome them. The combinations we design need to be rational and biologically informed. They need to be personalized to the particular patient and their individual tumor.
Could you share any updates from the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium?
The KATHERINE trial has been a major breakthrough in this field. It evaluated patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus anti-HER2 agents; about 80% of them received trastuzumab alone, while the 20% [were given] pertuzumab, too. If patients had residual disease, they moved on to a continuation of trastuzumab versus T-DM1. The study demonstrated quite a robust improvement in disease-free survival. We need to interpret these data with a lot of optimism. It is important to keep in mind that we personalize our approach for each individual patient. The patients who will do the best with this regimen are those similar to the ones enrolled in the trial, although all subgroups seemed to have similar benefit.
What are the biggest considerations in the field in terms of developing future agents?
As it stands today, pertuzumab is the frontline option in combination with trastuzumab and chemotherapy or endocrine therapy. Second-line treatment is T-DM1. With results from APHINITY and ExteNET, some proportion of patients are going to see these agents in the early-stage setting. If you want to use them again in the metastatic setting, enough time needs to pass, and we have data demonstrating that the efficacy will decrease.
We need to develop strategies to get around that. One idea that comes to mind is [the use of] TKIs. We have 2 in development. One is neratinib, which is approved in the extended adjuvant setting but not yet in the metastatic setting.
... to read the full story