New Targeted Therapies Show Promise for METex14-Altered NSCLC

Silas Inman @silasinman
Published: Monday, Jun 03, 2019

Karen L. Reckamp, MD

Karen L. Reckamp, MD

Two highly selective MET inhibitors, tepotinib and capmatinib (INC280), showed promising clinical activity in the first- and second-line treatment of patients with MET exon 14 (METex14)-altered advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), according to presentations at the 2019 ASCO Annual Meeting.1,2

In the phase II GEOMETRY study,1 capmatinib showed an objective response rate (ORR) by independent review (IR) of 67.9% (95% CI, 47.6%-84.1%) in treatment-naive patients with METex14-altered NSCLC. Additionally, in the phase II VISION study,2 the ORR by IR with tepotinib was 58.8% in untreated patients with NSCLC and an METex14 alteration determined by liquid biopsy.

“These are small cohorts of patients; the numbers of frontline patients are relatively small. When trying to parse down some of these data, we do see that response rates are high and are promising,” said ASCO invited discussant Karen L. Reckamp, MD, from City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center. “We did see in the second-line setting that responses drop off, which might be due to age and comorbidities. But the numbers are small in the first-line setting. Overall, we need more data.”

MET exon 14 skipping mutations have been identified in approximately 3% to 4% of NSCLC cases and are associated with a poor response to currently available therapies. Prior studies exploring MET inhibition have primarily examined multikinase inhibitors, such as crizotinib and cabozantinib. Both capmatinib and tepotinib, however, are more selective for MET, with IC50 measures of 0.6 nM and 3.0 nM, respectively, as compared with 7.8 nM and 22.5 nM, respectively, for cabozantinib and crizotinib.

Capmatinib in GEOMETRY

The GEOMETRY trial is examining capmatinib across several cohorts, with cohort 4 and 5b selected for presentation at ASCO. Cohort 4 contained pretreated patients with METex14 alterations in the second- or third-line setting (n = 69) while cohort 5b included treatment-naive patients (n = 28). The median age across both cohorts was 71 years, and approximately three-fourths had an ECOG status of 1. In cohort 4, 15.9% of patients had brain metastases compared with 10.7% in cohort 5b. The most common prior therapy used was platinum-based chemotherapy (88.4%).

In pretreated patients, the ORR by IR was 40.6% (95% CI, 28.9%-53.1%). The disease control rate (DCR; ORR plus stable disease) was 78.3% (95% CI, 66.7%-87.3%). In the frontline setting, the ORR by IR was 67.9% (95% CI, 47.6%-84.1%) and the DCR was 96.4% (95% CI, 81.7%-99.9%). “Deep responses were observed in a majority of patients across both cohorts,” lead investigator Juergen Wolf, MD, from the Center for Integrated Oncology, University Hospital Cologne, said during a presentation of the findings at ASCO.

The median duration of response (DOR) by IR was 9.72 months in pretreated patients and 11.14 months in those receiving capmatinib in the frontline setting. The median progression-free survival was 5.42 months in the pretreated group and 9.69 months for those treated in the frontline setting.

“Capmatinib is a potent and selective MET Inhibitor that represents a new potential treatment option in this rare but challenging patient population of advanced NSCLC harboring METexl4 mutations,” Wolf said. “Capmatinib has demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy in advanced NSCLC patients harboring METex14 mutations, and also demonstrated efficacy in patients with brain metastases.”

Approximately half of the patients with brain metastases at baseline experienced an intracranial response with capmatinib (7 of 13; 54%). Of these patients, 4 had a complete resolution of brain lesions (31%). The intracranial DCR was 92.3% (12 of 13).

“Deep responses and duration of response were observed independently of type of MET mutation leading to METex14 or co-occurrence of MET amplification,” said Wolf. “There was high concordance between next generation sequencing [NGS] and RT-PCR in detection of METex14 in tumor tissue.”

Safety was assessed across all cohorts examined in the study, which each included patients with MET dysregulated NSCLC (N = 334). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 31.1% of patients and a grade 4 event was seen in 4.5% of patients. Peripheral edema was the most common grade 3/4 event (7.5%) followed by fatigue (3.0%). The most common treatment-related AE of any grade was peripheral edema (41.6%), nausea (33.2%), increased blood creatinine (19.5%), and vomiting (18.9%).

Tepotinib in VISION


View Conference Coverage
Online CME Activities
TitleExpiration DateCME Credits
Clinical Practice Connections™: From Diagnosis to Emerging Immunotherapeutic Options: Understanding the Burden and Risks in Peanut AllergySep 28, 20191.0
Enduring CME activity from the School of Breast Oncology®: 2018 Mid-Year Video UpdateSep 28, 20192.0
Publication Bottom Border
Border Publication
x