Addition of Alpelisib Prolongs PFS in PIK3CA-Mutant HR+, HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer Subgroups

Kristie L. Kahl
Published: Friday, Mar 08, 2019

breast cancer
The previously demonstrated progression-free survival (PFS) benefit from the addition of alpelisib (BLY719) to fulvestrant (Faslodex) appeared consistent among subgroups of patients with hormone receptor (HR)–positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who have a PIK3CA mutation, according to results from the phase III SOLAR trial presented at the 2019 Miami Breast Cancer Conference®.1-3

PFS was assessed by line of therapy; it improved with second-line treatment of the combination (10.9 months vs 3.7 months; HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.42-0.89). Also, PFS was prolonged with the alpelisib combination in the circulating tumor (ct)-determined PIK3CA-mutant population.1

Similarly, a treatment benefit was observed whether a patient was previously treated with a CDK4/6 inhibitor (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.17-1.36) or without (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.51-0.87); however, the researchers noted the total number of patients enrolled who had received prior CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy was small (n = 20).

“Alpelisib is the first PI3K inhibitor to show clinically meaningful, statistically significant results in breast cancer,” the researchers wrote. “…Alpelisib plus fulvestrant is a potential new treatment option for patients with PIK3CA-mutant HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who have progressed on prior endocrine therapy (with/without a CDK4/6 inhibitor).”2

Previously reported findings from the PIK3CA-mutated subset of patients in SOLAR-1 showed a median PFS by local assessment of 11.0 months (95% CI, 7.5-14.5) for those who received the alpelisib combination compared with 5.7 months (95% CI, 3.7-7.4) for those who received placebo plus fulvestrant—resulting in a 35% reduction in the risk of progression or death, with a hazard ratio of 0.65 in favor of alpelisib (95% CI, 0.50-0.85; P = .00065).1-2

Of note, proof-of-concept criteria were not met and there was no advantage to alpelisib on median PFS in patients without a PIK3CA mutation (median PFS, 7.4 months vs 5.6 months; HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.58-1.25).

When PFS was assessed by a blinded independent review committee in the PIK3CA-mutated subgroup, the median PFS was 11.1 months (95% CI, 7.3-16.8) in the alpelisib combination arm versus 3.7 months (95% CI, 2.1-5.6) in the placebo arm, demonstrating a 7.4-month improvement with the addition of alpelisib to fulvestrant (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.32-0.71).

In addition, the overall response rate (ORR) was superior in the alpelisib combination arm (35.7%; 95% CI, 27.4%-44.7%) compared with the placebo group (16.2%; 95% CI, 10.4%-23.5%) in the PIK3CA-mutated subset.

Overall survival (OS) data at the first interim analysis in patients with a PIK3CA mutation were immature (52% of planned events); however, the median OS was not reached in the alpelisib combination arm compared with 26.9 months with placebo.

Regarding safety, the most common adverse events (AEs) in the entire safety population (occurring in >20% of patients) were consistent with previous findings of alpelisib, and included hyperglycemia (63.7% vs 9.8%), diarrhea (57.7% vs 15.7%), nausea (44.7% vs 22.3%), decreased appetite (35.6% vs 10.5%), rash (35.6% vs 5.9%), vomiting (27.1% vs 9.8%), decreased weight (26.8% vs 2.1%), stomatitis (24.6% vs 6.3%), fatigue (24.6% vs 6.3%), and asthenia (20.4% vs 12.9%) compared with placebo.3

In total, 6.3% of patients were reported to have discontinued alpelisib due to hyperglycemia and 3.2% of patients discontinued due to rash; no patients discontinued placebo due to either hyperglycemia or rash.

However, the researchers noted that hyperglycemia was easily identifiable and reversible in the study, adding that, “Screening and monitoring of blood glucose levels are recommended for patients receiving alpelisib (and) hyperglycemia should be managed with dietary measures and early pharmacologic intervention.”

“Awareness, prevention, and early management of common AEs associated with alpelisib are critical to ensure continued therapy and optimal clinical benefit,” they concluded.3

Currently, endocrine therapy, with or without a CDK4/6 inhibitor, serves as the first-line treatment for HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer; however, only 39% of patients remain progression-free on treatment 2.2 years after initiating treatment. “There is a need for new effective drugs in HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer resistant to endocrine therapy,” the researchers wrote.

In the phase Ib trial of alpelisib in combination with fulvestrant among heavily pretreated patients with estrogen receptor–positive advanced breast cancer and known PIK3CA mutation status, median PFS was longer in patients with PIK3CA-altered tumors (9.1 months) compared with wild-type tumors (4.7 months).4


View Conference Coverage
Online CME Activities
TitleExpiration DateCME Credits
Medical Crossfire®: Where Are We Headed in the Treatment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer?Jul 31, 20191.5
Community Practice Connections™: Evolving Applications for PARP Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer: Building on a Solid FoundationAug 15, 20191.5
Publication Bottom Border
Border Publication
x