Dr. Shah Discusses Potential of bb21217 in Multiple Myeloma

Video

In Partnership With:

Nina Shah, MD, associate professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, discusses the potential of bb21217 in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma.

Nina Shah, MD, associate professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, discusses the potential of bb21217 in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma.

In a study presented at the 2018 ASH Annual Meeting, the anti—BCMA chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy bb21217 was tested in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who were treated with at least 3 prior lines of therapy. Participants had to have been previously exposed to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor, while expressing at least 50% BCMA in their bone marrow plasma. Shah notes that this is a particularly difficult-to-treat patient population.

The toxicity profile associated with bb21217 was comparable to what it is typically seen with CAR T cells, Shah says. Two-thirds of patients had cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and most of these were grade 1 or 2 events; however 1 patient had a grade 3 event, Shah reports. Three patients had neurotoxicity, 2 of which were grade 1 or 2, but 1 patient had a grade 4 event with encephalopathy in the setting of a grade 3 CRS.

The grade 4 event, explains Shah, required her team to expand the dose level. Another 6 patients ended up receiving treatment at this dose level in order to determine if high versus low tumor burden could contribute to the safety signal. They found that the rest of the patients did not experience any dose-limiting toxicities, so they concluded the grade 4 event to be an isolated one.

Objective response rate was 83.3%, with a very good partial response or better rate of 75% in the 12-patient cohort. The complete remission (CR) or stringent CR rate was 25%, with a minimal residual disease negativity rate of 100% in this group. Greater follow up is needed to understand the full efficacy of the treatment, Shah notes.

Related Videos
Catherine C. Coombs, MD, associate clinical professor, medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
Naomi Adjei, MD, MPH, MSEd, gynecologic oncology fellow, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
John M. Kirkwood, MD, Distinguished Service Professor of Medicine, Sandra and Thomas Usher Professor of Medicine, Dermatology & Translational Science, coleader, Melanoma and Skin Cancer Program, Division of Hematology/Oncology, the University of Pittsburgh
Nizar M. Tannir, MD, FACP, professor; Ransom Horne, Jr. Professor for Cancer Research, Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
William B. Pearse, MD
Daniel Olson, MD
Nan Chen, MD
Robert Dreicer, MD, director, Solid Tumor Oncology, Division of Hematology/Oncology, professor of Medicine and Urology, deputy director, University of Virginia Cancer Center
Akriti Jain, MD
Samer A. Srour, MB ChB, MS