A Collaborative Model for Advanced Practice Providers Empowers Success

Jason Astrin, PA-C, MBA, DFAAPA
Published: Wednesday, Apr 11, 2018
Jason Astrin, PA-C, MBA, DFAAPA
Jason Astrin, PA-C, MBA, DFAAPA
Advanced practice providers (APPS) are playing anincreasingly important role in oncology care. The need for services is increasing, but there are not enough oncologists entering the profession. A deficit of 1487 oncologists is projected by 2025.1 In addition, oncologists are seeing more patients with comorbidities, requiring more physician time. And, although patient outcomes have improved thanks to the efficacy of new treatments, patients stay in the healthcare system longer. Additionally, the aging population and increased access to care have intensified the demand for services. Because of all these factors combined, the burden on oncologists is becoming unmanageable, leading many practices to turn to APPs (Table. Figure2,3)

Table. Advanced Practice Providers in Oncology Practice2,3

When to Add an App

The decision to hire an APP often occurs soon after a practice realizes its providers are overbooked. As the average number of days until first appointment gets longer and patients are referred to competitors, practices react by hiring an APP.

However, this snap decision often leads to disappointment, as an APP typically cannot instantaneously bridge the provider gap. A better business response is to anticipate growing patient volumes as well as an aging workforce and factor those into succession planning. It is sometimes possible to replace a retiring physician with 1 or 2 APPs. By preplanning 4 or 5 years ahead, practices can anticipate when another provider will be needed, allowing ample time to find and on-board the right person.

Figure. Apps in Oncology Practice3

Using the Right Staffing Model

Across The US Oncology Network, 2 APP healthcare delivery models are most prevalent: independent visit and shared visit. While both are collaborative, the most popular is the independent visit model. Under this, APPs manage their own clinic, spending most of their time on follow-up care. Interaction with supervising physicians occurs as needed, such as when a change in treatment plan is required. Often, a patient will see the APP between physician visits. Ideally, APPs have their own nursing support, their own offices, and dedicated exam rooms. This staffing model provides a high degree of independence and job satisfaction. Essentially, APPs run their clinics simultaneously and independently, but there is oversight, support, and collaboration from oncologists.

This delivery model is the best method by far for optimizing APP performance and productivity. Unfortunately, it is sometimes not fully taken advantage of because some physicians have difficulty letting go of their patients. Oncologists become competitive with the APP, creating an unproductive environment. When this happens, APPs generally lose their independence and are at risk of diminishing job satisfaction. They may be required to share the physician’s clinic—seeing the same patents with the physician simultaneously. Consequently, patients end up being cared for by 2 providers during their visits. Productivity for both providers, as well as patient volume, does not increase.

APPs get discouraged with this situation because rather than providing care, they spend most of their time following the physician, essentially becoming an expensive scribe. When an APP is not allowed to practice to credentialed capability—or top of license— seeing patients independently and managing a clinic, the practice is wasting a valuable resource.

View Conference Coverage
Online CME Activities
TitleExpiration DateCME Credits
Community Practice Connections™: Addressing Post-Transplant Obstacles: Current and Emerging Strategies to Evolve the Standard of Care for Patients With Graft-Versus-Host DiseaseMar 28, 20192.0
2017 Year in Review™: Clinical Impact of Immunotherapies in the Treatment of CancerMar 30, 20191.75
Publication Bottom Border
Border Publication