
Opinion|Videos|December 20, 2024
Beyond T315I mutations: When to Consider Ponatinib or Asciminib in CML Second-Line Treatment
Panelists discuss how when choosing between asciminib and ponatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia treatment, key considerations include the patient’s mutation status, prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy response, cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities, and the differing safety profiles of the 2 drugs, with ponatinib generally having more cardiovascular concerns but broader mutation coverage vs asciminib’s more favorable tolerability but more specific targeting of BCR::ABL1.
Advertisement
Video content above is prompted by the following:
- What do you consider when making a treatment decision between asciminib and ponatinib?
- What disease-specific factors do you consider?
- What patient factors do you consider?
Advertisement
Related to this article

Oral azacitidine and cedazuridine met the end point of total cycle azacitidine exposure vs subcutaneous azacitidine in MDS or CMML.

Interim data showed that the BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapy NXC-201 generated complete responses in relapsed/refractory AL amyloidosis.

Estelamari Rodriguez, MD, MPH, discusses the rationale, design, and practice implications of the phase 3 RELATIVITY-1093 trial in nonsquamous NSCLC.

The third BLA submission for tabelecleucel follows 2 CRLs and includes updated ALLELE data with additional patients and longer follow-up.

A New England Journal of Medicine report describes complete hepatoblastoma regression in a 3-year-old treated with a novel immunotherapy.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on OncLive
1
FDA Grants Fast Track Designation to Plinabulin Plus Docetaxel in Post-ICI Non-Squamous NSCLC
2
Breast Cancer Experts Highlight Abstracts to Watch at ESMO 2026
3
FDA Approves Denosumab Biosimilar for Skeletal-Related Events, GCTB, and Hypercalcemia of Malignancy
4
Navigating DLL3-Targeting T-Cell Engagers and the Evolving Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment Landscape
5



