
Supplements and Featured Publications
- Treatment Trends and Ongoing Research in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
- Volume 1
- Issue 1
Blinatumomab Becomes Standard Addition to Consolidation Chemo in B-ALL, Irrespective of MRD Status
Daniel DeAngelo, MD, PhD, discusses the expanded role of blinatumomab in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia management
Since its initial approval in 2014, the role of blinatumomab (Blincyto) in the management of B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) has expanded significantly with evidence increasingly demonstrating its efficacy for both adult and pediatric patient populations, according to Daniel DeAngelo, MD, PhD, who added that the agent has become a standard addition to consolidation regimens regardless of minimal residual disease (MRD) status or backbone chemotherapy.
Most recently, in June 2024,
“Blinatumomab is a bispecific T-cell engager, and it's changed the way we think about the approach for our patients with ALL,” said DeAngelo, a professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School as well as chief of the Division of Leukemia and an institute physician at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, Massachusetts. “We heard from the plenary talk at the
In an interview with OncLive®, DeAngelo discussed up-front stratification and treatment considerations for patients with ALL; detailed considerations for transplant in unique phenotypes such as Ph-like and hypodiploid ALL; and highlighted how the most recent FDA approval of blinatumomab has expanded the agent’s use as a standard of care (SOC) beyond adult patient populations.
OncLive: How do you stratify and approach first-line treatment for patients with ALL, and what are the emerging strategies for incorporating biologic agents into treatment regimens?
DeAngelo: ALL is not a common disease. It's the most common cancer in pediatric [oncology], and [there] has been an incredibly successful history in terms of improving outcomes [for that population]. In adult patients, [efforts to improve] outcomes have been a little bit lackluster compared with our pediatric colleagues. In up-front cases, we typically stratify patients [according to whether they have] Ph-positive or -negative ALL. For Ph-positive [patients], the approach that most of us are taking is a second- or third-generation TKI plus minimal chemotherapy and adding blinatumomab to that approach.
For the Ph-negative patients, most of us will take an age-based approach [to treatment]. For patients in the adolescent and young adult [(AYA) population], we usually use pediatric-inspired regimens, and that includes asparaginase. [This is] a loosely defined group of patients. The National Cancer Institute and I would agree to define [AYA] as less than 40 years of age, [although] some places define it as less than 50 years, and some [others define it] as less than 30 years.
For our older patients, we're using lower-intensity therapies. That's where most of the effort and work will emerge. We also saw a lot of data from the 2024 ASH Annual Meeting incorporating some of our biologic agents, [namely] inotuzumab ozogamicin [Besponsa] and blinatumomab, with lower-intensity chemotherapy regimens. [Determining the] right regimen and the best way to incorporate [these agents into practice] is still a work in progress.
How do the distinctions between T-cell and B-cell ALL influence frontline treatment strategies?
When thinking about frontline therapy, [it is also important to bifurcate] whether patients have T-cell or B-cell disease; this is important because in older [patients], using fractionated inotuzumab ozogamicin plus low-dose chemotherapy, for example, is only going to be [effective] in CD22-positive or B-cell ALL. In younger patients, the addition of blinatumomab and other similar agents in the post-remission or consolidation setting, based on [data from] the phase 3 ECOG-ACRIN E1910 study [NCT02003222], is only going to be useful in B-cell ALL.
Many of the immunologic approaches have been abandoned in T-cell ALL. Some of us are adding nelarabine [(Arranon) injections], but most of us are incorporating age-based, pediatric-inspired [treatment] for young patients; for older patients, we are trying to advocate for a pure chemotherapy approach with or without the addition of nelarabine.
What considerations guide decisions about transplant in patients with unique phenotypes, such as Ph-like or hypodiploid ALL?
The big question here is, ‘What's the best TKI, and do patients who achieve minimal residual disease [MRD] negative status need to [undergo] transplant?’ We're transplanting fewer and fewer patients with [MRD negative status]. It's important to be cognizant of the fact that in the Ph-negative group, approximately one-third of patients are going to have something called a Ph-like [phenotype]. This is enriched in the Hispanic and Native American populations, and it portends a poorer prognosis. [Ph-like ALL is] often associated with an IKZF1 deletion, which is adversely prognostic [by itself]. Many of these patients will be candidates for transplant at first remission. Some of those patients may also have targetable lesions, such as a JAK2 mutation or another lesion that may be targeted by a TKI.
Other important frontline discussions [include] whether patients have hypodiploid [ALL]. For example, many [patients with low hypodiploidy will harbor] TP53 [mutations]. Some of them may have Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Others may be de novo cases, so they may not have a family history. That has important consequences in terms of taking those patients to transplant.
How has the role of blinatumomab evolved in B-ALL over the last decade?
Blinatumomab is useful because CD19 is ubiquitously expressed in virtually all cases of ALL. [Following]
Subsequently, the [confirmatory phase 2] BLAST study [NCT01207388] evaluated the use of blinatumomab for patients who were MRD-positive [after CR]. This [study comprised] 2 groups of patients: either those who were in remission but [did not] achieve MRD negativity, or those who—if they were to achieve MRD-negative remission—emerged with an MRD-positive clone. In those patients, the addition of blinatumomab followed by transplant improved [OS] outcomes, and a vast majority of patients were able to achieve MRD negativity. [This supported the agent’s
Then [data from] the ECOG-ACRIN E1910 study [were presented in] a late breaking abstract [at the 2022 ASH Annual Meeting] and were published in the New England Journal of Medicine in the summer of 2024. This [study] used an adult regimen, so it [included patients] 30 [years of age] and older. They were using a backbone therapy based on the [phase 3] ECOG E2993 trial [NCT00002514], which hasn't been a popular regimen. Patients in remission [who were] MRD negative and Ph-negative were randomly assigned to receive continued chemotherapy, or they would receive [chemotherapy] plus 4 cycles of blinatumomab. There was a profound improvement in both event-free survival [EFS] and OS [with the addition of blinatumomab], which led [the FDA to extend the] label for [blinatumomab in 2024 to include] MRD-negative patients.
What have been the clinical implications of this FDA approval of blinatumomab in the consolidation phase for CD19-positive, Ph-negative B-cell precursor ALL?
The idea of incorporating blinatumomab as consolidation—regardless of MRD status—has now become a SOC. Based on the plenary talk at the 2024 ASH Annual Meeting showing that the addition of blinatumomab to a pediatric regimen in the consolidation phase improved EFS and OS, [blinatumomab’s use] now extends beyond the adult population, and it probably doesn't matter what the backbone chemotherapy is [used]. Virtually everybody's getting blinatumomab, whether they have relapsed/refractory disease, are MRD-positive, or have MRD-negative status. If a patient is Ph-positive, it's being incorporated with a TKI. Blinatumomab [is being more widely used] in trying to eradicate lymphoblast clones in the post-remission setting.
What are some other emerging areas of interest within ALL research?
[Another] exciting update [in ALL to emerge from] the 2024 ASH Annual Meeting is the whole field of menin inhibitors, [particularly for patients] with KMT2A rearrangements. These [alterations] are rare, [and are present in] approximately 5% to 8% of patients with ALL. These are difficult-to-treat [malignancies], and we often try to transplant patients. We now have a drug called
Reference
FDA approves Blincyto (blinatumomab) in CD19-positive Philadelphia chromosome-negative B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) in the consolidation phase. News release. Amgen. June 14, 2024. Accessed January 7, 2025. https://www.amgen.com/newsroom/press-releases/2024/06/fda-approves-blincyto-blinatumomab-in-cd19positive-philadelphia-chromosomenegative-bcell-precursor-acute-lymphoblastic-leukemia-ball-in-the-consolidation-phase
Articles in this issue
about 1 year ago
Dr Jabbour on Frontline Treatment Considerations in ALL


































