
Dr Ackroyd on the Assessment of Time Toxicity in Advanced/Recurrent Endometrial Cancer
Sarah Ackroyd, MD, MPH, discusses the rationale and key results from a study of time-related treatment burden in patients receiving treatment for advanced, recurrent endometrial cancer.
Sarah Ackroyd, MD, MPH fellow, gynecologic oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, discusses the rationale and key results from a study of time-related treatment burden in patients receiving treatment for advanced, recurrent endometrial cancer.
In the field of gynecologic cancer, there has been increasing emphasis on the value of patient-reported outcomes for guiding treatment decisions, Ackroyd begins. Accordingly, it is important to consider and discuss a patient's financial toxicity, she says. However, there is currently no standard measurement or understanding of a patient's time-related burden while on treatment, or how this impacts their financial wellbeing, Ackroyd explains.
Researchers proposed a study to measure treatment-related time burden, evaluate this time toxicity for different regimens, and correlate this measure with patients' quality of life (QOL), Ackroyd states. The study evaluated patients with advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer of varying histology, who received comprehensive care at a single institution or health system. Time toxicity was defined as the total number of days spent at a healthcare facility divided by the number of days on treatment. Data were collected using self-reported demographics, qualitative structured interviews on decision preference, a QOL survey, and chart review to measure time toxicity.
Initial results from the study were presented at
Moreover, QOL decreased as the percentage of time spent at the healthcare facility increased across all patient cohorts, Ackroyd notes. This finding could be attributed to several risk factors or time-related complications, including the presence of severity of comorbidities, Ackroyd concludes.



































