Dr. Bloom Compares HER2 Screening Assays

Video

Dr. Kenneth Bloom, the Chief Medical Officer at Clarient, Compares HER2 Screening Assays

Kenneth J. Bloom, MD, Chief Medical Officer, Clarient, compares the immunohistochemistry (IHC) and FISH assays for use in routine screening for HER2 expression.

Bloom describes that HER2 testing can be very complicated but that several FDA cleared assays have simplified the process. The approved assays were also used in many of the clinical trials investigating HER2 expression, which further demonstrates their efficacy.

Many of the assays provide similar end results. From a pathologists viewpoint Bloom recommends using the immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay first. The results of the IHC test are equivalent to FISH, however he notes that IHC is quicker, easier to perform, and does not require specialized equipment.

The FISH test requires a darkened room, under high power, and irradiates the lab tech. The IHC assay is more conducive to routine screening because it does not have as many complications.

Related Videos
Scott Kopetz, MD, PhD, FACP
Katharina Hoebel, MD, PhD
Catherine C. Coombs, MD, associate clinical professor, medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
Naomi Adjei, MD, MPH, MSEd, gynecologic oncology fellow, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
John M. Kirkwood, MD, Distinguished Service Professor of Medicine, Sandra and Thomas Usher Professor of Medicine, Dermatology & Translational Science, coleader, Melanoma and Skin Cancer Program, Division of Hematology/Oncology, the University of Pittsburgh
Nizar M. Tannir, MD, FACP, professor; Ransom Horne, Jr. Professor for Cancer Research, Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
William B. Pearse, MD
Daniel Olson, MD
Nan Chen, MD
Robert Dreicer, MD, director, Solid Tumor Oncology, Division of Hematology/Oncology, professor of Medicine and Urology, deputy director, University of Virginia Cancer Center