Video

Dr. Brose Discusses Lenvatinib and Sorafenib in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

Marcia S. Brose, MD, PhD, assistant professor, Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania, discusses the rapidly changing treatment landscape for patients with differentiated thyroid cancer.

Marcia S. Brose, MD, PhD, assistant professor, Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania, discusses the rapidly changing treatment landscape for patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC).

In November 2013, the FDA approved sorafenib as a treatment for patients with radioactive iodine (RAI)-refractory DTC, based on data from the DECISION trial. In this phase III study, the median progression-free survival (PFS) with sorafenib was 10.8 months versus 5.8 months for placebo (HR = 0.587; P <.0001).

In October, the FDA granted a priority review designation to lenvatinib as a treatment for patients with RAI-refractory DTC, based on data from the SELECT trial. In this phase III study, the risk of progression was reduced by 79% in patients treated with lenvatinib compared with placebo. Furthermore, an updated analysis from the study indicated that patients in North America demonstrated similar benefits with lenvatinib as the full study population, Brose notes. A final decision date for this drug has been set for April 14, 2015.

In a subgroup analysis from the DECISION trial, patients with tumors that were smaller than 1.5 cm derived less of a benefit from sorafenib, suggesting a watch and wait approach might be ideal, Brose notes. Additionally, patients with pulmonary only disease seemed to benefit the most from sorafenib. Other subtypes, such as poorly differentiated tumors, were more likely to do poorly. As a result, patients with this subtype are ideal candidates for a clinical trial, Brose suggests.

Brose anticipates a similar subgroup analysis from the lenvatinib study, which could help find an optimal approach to treating patients with both drugs. Once more than 1 drug is available, studies should begin to focus on therapeutic sequencing, to find the most effective treatment strategy, Brose suggests. However, at this point, it remains unclear whether there is an ideal therapeutic sequence.

<<<

View more from the 2014 ATA Annual Meeting

Related Videos
Jacob Sands, MD, oncology medical director, International Patient Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; assistant professor, Harvard Medical School
Fred R. Hirsch, MD, PhD, executive director, Center for Thoracic Oncology, The Tisch Cancer Institute at Mount Sinai; Joe Lowe and Louis Price Professor of Medicine (Hematology and Medical Oncology), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Lori Wirth, MD
Marshall Posner, MD
Julia Rotow, MD, clinical director, Lowe Center for Thoracic Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; assistant professor, medicine, Harvard Medical School
Joshua K. Sabari, MD, assistant professor, Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine; director, High Reliability Organization Initiatives, Perlmutter Cancer Center
Leah Backhus, MD, MPH, FACS, professor, University Medical Line, Cardiothoracic Surgery, co-director, Thoracic Surgery Clinical Research Program, associate program director, Thoracic Track, CT Surgery Residency Training Program, Thelma and Henry Doelger Professor of Cardiovascular Surgery, Stanford Medicine; chief, Thoracic Surgery, VA Palo Alto
Roy S. Herbst, MD, PhD, Ensign Professor of Medicine (Medical Oncology), professor, pharmacology, deputy director, Yale Cancer Center; chief, Medical Oncology, director, Center for Thoracic Cancers, Yale Cancer Center and Smilow Cancer Hospital; assistant dean, Translational Research, Yale School of Medicine
Sheldon M. Feldman, MD
Rita Mukhtar, MD