Commentary

Video

Dr Dreyling on Safety Data With ASCT Plus Ibrutinib and Rituximab in Lower-Risk, Younger MCL

Martin Dreyling, MD, discusses updated safety results from the randomized phase 3 TRIANGLE trial in younger patients with lower-risk MCL.

“[In TRIANGLE, during] follow-up, [54% of patients who received rituximab, ibrutinib, and ASCT] had myelosuppression [or other blood and lymphatic system disorders]. [The addition of ASCT] also translated to an increased rate of infections during the 2-year follow-up period. Therefore, ASCT should be only applied when it must be and only in high-risk patients.”

Martin Dreyling, MD, full professor, Department of Medicine, University Hospital LMU Munich, discusses updated safety results from the randomized phase 3 TRIANGLE trial (NCT02858258), which evaluated the addition of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) to ibrutinib (Imbruvica) plus chemotherapy and rituximab (Rituxan) maintenance in the first-line setting for younger patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).

Updated data presented at the 2024 ASH Annual Meeting showed that at a median follow-up of 55 months, treatment with chemotherapy and rituximab plus ASCT (arm A; n = 288) did not result in superior failure-free survival (FFS) compared with chemotherapy, rituximab, and ibrutinib without ASCT (arm I; n = 290). However, the addition of ASCT to chemotherapy, rituximab, and ibrutinib (arm A+I; n = 292) did not significantly improve FFS over arm I (4-year FFS rate, 82% vs 81%; 1-sided P = .21; HR, 0.83). Overall survival findings also suggested that ASCT does not provide additional survival benefit when combined with chemotherapy, rituximab, and ibrutinib.

Safety data indicate that patients, particularly those with high-risk MCL, benefited from rituximab and ibrutinib maintenance; however, out of these 3 [treatments], ASCT is associated with the highest toxicity burden, Dreyling continues. Myelosuppression and other blood and lymphatic system disorders occurred in 54% of patients in arm A+I, approximately twice the rate observed in the other trial arms, he reports. Additionally, the rate of infections during the 2-year follow-up period was higher in arm A+I (34%) compared with arm I (26%), Dreyling notes.

Given the increased toxicity associated with ASCT, the findings suggest that this approach should be reserved for high-risk patients who would derive the most benefit, Dreyling says. For many patients with MCL, the combination of chemotherapy, rituximab, and ibrutinib without ASCT may represent a less toxic and equally effective treatment strategy, he concludes.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on the most recent and practice-changing oncology data

Related Videos
Dr Fakih on the Future of Botensilimab and Balstilimab–Based Therapies in MSS mCRC
Alberto Montero, MD, MBA, CPHQ
Elizabeth Lee, MD, a gynecologic oncologist and the gynecologic oncology program's liaison to the Center for Cancer Therapeutics Innovation at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Taliya Lantsman, MD, a hematology/oncology fellow at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Alvaro Alencar, MD, discusses current unmet needs following the development of covalent BTK inhibitor resistance in CLL.
Melanie A. Sheen, MD
Raajit Rampal, MD, director of the Center for Hematologic Malignancies and director of the Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Program at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Shannon N. Westin, MD, MPH, FACOG, director, Early Drug Development, clinical medical director, professor, Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, Division of Surgery, codirector, Ovarian Cancer Moonshot Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center