scout
Commentary|Videos|May 9, 2025

Dr Fenske on Assessing the Role of Auto-HCT in the Current MCL Treatment Paradigm

Timothy S. Fenske, MD, MS, discusses the rationale for evaluating the role of standard auto-HCT in MCL given recent updates to the MCL treatment paradigm.

“We undertook this study, ECOG-ACRIN EA4151, to explore whether the autologous transplant does still offer benefit [to patients] in the current [MCL] treatment era.”

Timothy S. Fenske, MD, MS, section head of Hematologic Malignancies in the Division of Hematology/Oncology at the Medical College of Wisconsin, discussed the rationale for the phase 3 ECOG-ACRIN EA4151 trial (NCT-3267433) investigating autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) in patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).

Patients with MCL are typically treated with auto-HCT once they have achieved complete remission (CR) with first-line therapy, Fenske began. However, with the advent of improved first-line treatment options for this patient population, the necessity of auto-HCT has come into question, he said.

Notably, the phase 3 TRIANGLE trial (NCT02858258) previously showed that auto-HCT did not provide added benefit when used in conjunction with induction and maintenance therapy regimens containing rituximab (Rituxan), ibrutinib (Imbruvica), and high-dose cytarabine in patients with MCL.

The ECOG-ACRIN EA4151 trial was designed to answer the question of whether auto-HCT is still beneficial in the context of this expanded treatment paradigm, according to Fenske. The study enrolled patients with MCL experiencing first deep CR with frontline rituximab-containing induction therapy, as measured by a minimal residual disease (MRD) assay. Overall survival served as the study’s primary end point. Progression-free survival and undetectable MRD conversion rates served as key secondary end points.

The trial assigned a total of 650 patients to 1 of 4 arms: auto-HCT plus rituximab in patients in MRD-negative CR (arm A; n = 257), rituximab alone in patients in MRD-negative CR (arm B; n = 259), auto-HCT plus rituximab in patients in partial response or MRD-positive CR (arm C; n = 49), and auto-HCT plus rituximab in patients with indeterminate MRD status (arm D; n = 85).

Disclosures: Fenske reported receiving honoraria from AbbVie, Adaptive Biotechnologies, ADC Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Janssen, Kite, Lilly, Ono Pharmaceuticals, SeaGen, and Bayer; performing speakers bureau roles with AstraZeneca, Beigene, Kite, and SeaGen; and performing consultancy roles for AbbVie, Adaptive Biotechnologies, ADC Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Janssen, Kite, Lilly, Ono Pharmaceuticals, SeaGen, and Bayer.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on the most recent and practice-changing oncology data


Latest CME