
Dr Gopal on the Significance of the EV-302 and CheckMate 901 Trials in mUC
Nikhil A. Gopal, MD, discusses how the phase 3 EV-302 and CheckMate 901 trials have advanced the treatment paradigm in metastatic urothelial cancer.
Nikhil A. Gopal, MD, assistant professor, urology, assistant professor, College of Medicine - Memphis, Department of Urology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, discusses how the phase 3 EV-302/KEYNOTE-A39 trial (NCT04223856) and CheckMate 901 trials (NCT03036098) have shifted the treatment paradigm in metastatic urothelial cancer.
These 2 studies, which were presented at the
The first of these was the CheckMate 901 trial evaluating the triplet regimen of nivolumab (Opdivo) plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in metastatic or unresectable urothelial carcinoma, Gopal states. The triplet showed a survival benefit in the frontline setting for cisplatin-eligible patients, producing a median OS of 21.7 months (95% CI, 18.6-26.4) vs 18.9 months (95% CI, 14.7-22.4) with chemotherapy alone (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.63-0.96; P = .0171), he details. Although the trial represents one of the first studies to demonstrate a prolonged survival benefit with cisplatin-based chemotherapy and immunotherapy in the frontline setting, these results were accompanied b by equally impressive findings from the EV-302 study, Gopal notes.
EV-302 investigated enfortumab-ejfv (Padcev) vedotin plus pembrolizumab (Keytruda) vs standard-of-care (SOC) platinum-based chemotherapy therapy in treatment-naive patients with metastatic urothelial cancer. The regimen produced a median OS of 31.5 months (95% CI, 25.4-not reached) vs 16.1 months (95% CI, 13.9-18.3) with chemotherapy at a median follow-up of 17.2 months, Gopal reports.
Consequently, enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab has become the SOC in the frontline setting for metastatic urothelial carcinoma following its
Despite its efficicy, the accessibility and cost of this treatment remain important real-world considerations, especially given its higher cost compared to platinum-based therapy, Gopal notes. Nonetheless, the approval of enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab represents a paradigm shift in the management of metastatic urothelial carcinoma, particularly for cisplatin-ineligible patients who previously lacked effective treatment options, he concludes.


































