Commentary

Video

Dr Hall on Unmet Needs in Later-Line RCC

Fact checked by:

Evan T. Hall, MD, Mphil, discusses several avenues for future research in later-line renal cell carcinoma.

"Right now, most of our treatments fall into a few baskets, so sometimes we’re left with uncomfortable decisions about using drugs that may interact with patient comorbidities. [Patients need] more options and [drugs with] different mechanisms, with the hope that perhaps we can find better fits for individual patients in the second- and third-line settings."

Evan T. Hall, MD, MPhil, a physician and assistant professor in the Clinical Research Division at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center; as well as an assistant professor at the University of Washington School of Medicine, highlighted several key unmet needs for patients with later-line renal cell carcinoma (RCC) that may be addressed by future research.

One major gap is the need for a second opportunity at achieving long-term disease control, Hall began. According to Hall, enduring remission and the potential for a treatment-free interval appear to be phenomena associated primarily with immunotherapy. He explained that although TKIs can suppress disease progression during active treatment, relapse typically occurs upon discontinuation. Thus, developing a second-line or even third-line therapy with immunomodulatory potential to induce prolonged remission could represent a significant advancement, Hall noted.

Hall also emphasized the importance of expanding therapeutic targets with differentiated toxicity profiles. Many patients with RCC are older and often present with comorbidities, such as coronary artery disease, heart failure, prior stroke, or diabetes. Hall observed that current later-line treatment options tend to cluster within a limited number of drug classes, many of which carry adverse effect profiles that may exacerbate underlying conditions. He stated that broader mechanistic diversity in available therapies could help oncologists better tailor treatment to individual patient needs, thereby improving tolerability and reducing the risk of treatment-related complications.

Ultimately, Hall concluded that the later-line RCC treatment paradigm wouldbenefit from therapies with novel mechanisms and improved safety profiles, particularly those that offer the potential for durable responses and allow for better personalization based on comorbid conditions.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on the most recent and practice-changing oncology data

Latest CME

View All
Tumor Board: Expert Insights on Managing Classical 𝘌𝘎𝘍𝘙 Mutations, 𝘌𝘎𝘍𝘙 Exon 20 Insertions, and Atypical 𝘌𝘎𝘍𝘙 Mutations in Metastatic NSCLC
Video

Tumor Board: Expert Insights on Managing Classical 𝘌𝘎𝘍𝘙 Mutations, 𝘌𝘎𝘍𝘙 Exon 20 Insertions, and Atypical 𝘌𝘎𝘍𝘙 Mutations in Metastatic NSCLC

Jun 6th 2025 - Jul 12th 2025

online-activity
Medical Crossfire®: Expert Perspectives on Targeting c-Met Overexpression and 𝘔𝘌𝘛 Genomic Alterations in NSCLC – Unveiling the Complexities of 𝘔𝘌𝘛 Dysregulation
Video

Medical Crossfire®: Expert Perspectives on Targeting c-Met Overexpression and 𝘔𝘌𝘛 Genomic Alterations in NSCLC – Unveiling the Complexities of 𝘔𝘌𝘛 Dysregulation

Jun 6th 2025 - Jul 12th 2025

online-activity
Evolving Treatment Strategies in Pancreatic Cancer: Current Standards, Emerging Targets, and the Role of Molecular Testing
Video

Evolving Treatment Strategies in Pancreatic Cancer: Current Standards, Emerging Targets, and the Role of Molecular Testing

Jun 5th 2025 - Jul 12th 2025

online-activity