
Dr Hayne on Mitomycin/BCG as an Alternative to BCG Alone in Non–Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
Dickon Hayne, MD, FRCS, MBBS, discusses the use of mitomycin plus BCG as a potential alternative to BCG alone in non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
“In terms of safety and tolerability, [the profile of] BCG plus mitomycin was very similar to BCG alone. However, there were significantly fewer treatment discontinuations and 40% less BCG utilization in the BCG plus mitomycin arm vs the BCG alone arm.”
Dickon Hayne, MD, FRCS, MBBS, a professor of urology at The University of Western Australia Medical School, as well as a consultant urological surgeon and the head of Urology for the South Metropolitan Health Service, discussed how mitomycin plus BCG could pose a feasible alternative to BCG alone in non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).
Data from the phase 3 ANZUP 1301 trial (NCT02948543), which were presented at the
Of note,
The study included patients with high-risk NMIBC with high-grade Ta or any grade T1 disease, who were eligible to receive intravesical chemotherapy. Patients were then randomly assigned to either the mitomycin/BCG arm or the BCG alone arm. In the combination arm, BCG was administered during weeks 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, and 8; mitomycin was given on weeks 3, 6, and 9 during the induction period. Conversely, those in the BCG monotherapy arm were given BCG weekly from weeks 1 to 6.
DFS served as the study’s primary end point. Other end points included CR on cystoscopy and biopsy at 3 months, time to recurrence, time to progression, overall survival, safety, and health-related quality of life.
Based on data from the trial, mitomycin plus BCG could provide a beneficial alternative to BCG alone, which is essential during the ongoing BCG shortage, Hayne emphasized. A widespread adoption of the combination could ultimately help alleviate the shortage, he concluded.



































