Dr. Kopetz on the Rationale for the BEACON CRC Study in BRAF V600E-Mutant mCRC

Video

Scott Kopetz, MD, PhD, FACP, discusses the rationale for the phase 3 BEACON CRC trial in BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer.

Scott Kopetz, MD, PhD, FACP, associate professor, Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses the rationale for the phase 3 BEACON CRC trial in BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC is associated with a poor prognosis, says Kopetz. Moreover, there was not an established standard of care for this subgroup of patients until recently.

The rationale for the BEACON CRC study, which evaluated the combination of encorafenib (Braftovi) and cetuximab (Erbitux) with or without binimetinib (Mektovi) versus standard chemotherapy, was based on the understanding that BRAF inhibitors alone do not elicit substantial tumor regression, explains Kopetz.

The goal of the study was to understand how to maximize BRAF pathway inhibition while intercepting mechanisms of resistance, concludes Kopetz.

Related Videos
Jorge J. Castillo, MD,
Heinz-Josef Lenz, MD, FACP
Sundar Jagannath, MBBS, director, Center of Excellence for Multiple Myeloma, professor of medicine (hematology and medical oncology), The Tisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai
Omid Hamid, MD, professor, medicine, Cedars-Sinai; director, Clinical Research and Immunotherapy, director, Cutaneous Oncology and Melanoma, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute
Christina L. Roland, MD, MS, FACS
Ashish Saxena, MD, PhD
Shruti Tiwari, MD
Scott Kopetz, MD, PhD, FACP
Katharina Hoebel, MD, PhD
Catherine C. Coombs, MD, associate clinical professor, medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine