Commentary

Video

Dr Lee on the Real-World Safety Profile of Axi-Cel in R/R LBCL

Dasom (Caroline) Lee, MD, details the safety results of second-line axicabtagene ciloleucel in real-world patients with relapsed/refractory LBCL.

“What we found is that the toxicity profile [of axi-cel], including CRS and ICANS, was similar [between the real-world analysis] and the ZUMA-7 trial for the short-term follow-up.”

Dasom (Caroline) Lee, MD, Hematology and Medical Oncology Fellowship Program, Stanford Medicine, Stanford Health Care, details the real-world safety results for the second-line use of the CAR T-cell therapy axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel; Yescarta) in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) compared with outcomes for patients treated with axi-cel in the phase 3 ZUMA-7 trial (NCT03391466).

Findings from the real-world analysis, presented at the 2024 ASH Annual Meeting, demonstrated that patients treated in the real-world setting experienced an objective response rate of 79% and a complete response rate of 64% at a median follow-up of 12.0 months (95% CI, 11.5-12.1). In the real-world study, the 12-month event-free survival rate was 53% (95% CI, 48%-58%), and the 12-month overall survival rate was 71% (95% CI, 56%-76%).

Regarding safety, reports of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were similar at the short-term follow-up between patients in the real-world analysis and the ZUMA-7 trial, Lee begins. Following these data, she notes that a longer-term follow-up will be needed to confirm these findings.

Of note, any-grade CRS following treatment with axi-cel occurred in 87% of patients in the real-world analysis; grade 3 or higher CRS was reported in 5% of patients. Any grade ICANS occurred in 50% of patients, and grade 3 or higher ICANS occurred in 22%.

More non-relapse mortalities occur at 6 months in patients who were ineligible for the ZUMA-7 trial, Lee explains. Major factors causing ineligibility included organ impairment (34%) and prior malignancies (16%). Therefore, she emphasizes the importance of having a long-term follow-up to not only help confirm the findings from the real-world analysis but also to identify the drivers of non-relapse mortality. After this is established, the next step is to prevent these complications for the respective patient population, Lee concludes.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on the most recent and practice-changing oncology data

Related Videos
Dr Fakih on the Future of Botensilimab and Balstilimab–Based Therapies in MSS mCRC
Alberto Montero, MD, MBA, CPHQ
Elizabeth Lee, MD, a gynecologic oncologist and the gynecologic oncology program's liaison to the Center for Cancer Therapeutics Innovation at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Taliya Lantsman, MD, a hematology/oncology fellow at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Alvaro Alencar, MD, discusses current unmet needs following the development of covalent BTK inhibitor resistance in CLL.
Melanie A. Sheen, MD
Raajit Rampal, MD, director of the Center for Hematologic Malignancies and director of the Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Program at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Shannon N. Westin, MD, MPH, FACOG, director, Early Drug Development, clinical medical director, professor, Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, Division of Surgery, codirector, Ovarian Cancer Moonshot Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center