scout
Commentary|Videos|February 18, 2025

Dr Lee on the Real-World Safety Profile of Axi-Cel in R/R LBCL

Dasom (Caroline) Lee, MD, details the safety results of second-line axicabtagene ciloleucel in real-world patients with relapsed/refractory LBCL.

“What we found is that the toxicity profile [of axi-cel], including CRS and ICANS, was similar [between the real-world analysis] and the ZUMA-7 trial for the short-term follow-up.”

Dasom (Caroline) Lee, MD, Hematology and Medical Oncology Fellowship Program, Stanford Medicine, Stanford Health Care, details the real-world safety results for the second-line use of the CAR T-cell therapy axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel; Yescarta) in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) compared with outcomes for patients treated with axi-cel in the phase 3 ZUMA-7 trial (NCT03391466).

Findings from the real-world analysis, presented at the 2024 ASH Annual Meeting, demonstrated that patients treated in the real-world setting experienced an objective response rate of 79% and a complete response rate of 64% at a median follow-up of 12.0 months (95% CI, 11.5-12.1). In the real-world study, the 12-month event-free survival rate was 53% (95% CI, 48%-58%), and the 12-month overall survival rate was 71% (95% CI, 56%-76%).

Regarding safety, reports of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were similar at the short-term follow-up between patients in the real-world analysis and the ZUMA-7 trial, Lee begins. Following these data, she notes that a longer-term follow-up will be needed to confirm these findings.

Of note, any-grade CRS following treatment with axi-cel occurred in 87% of patients in the real-world analysis; grade 3 or higher CRS was reported in 5% of patients. Any grade ICANS occurred in 50% of patients, and grade 3 or higher ICANS occurred in 22%.

More non-relapse mortalities occur at 6 months in patients who were ineligible for the ZUMA-7 trial, Lee explains. Major factors causing ineligibility included organ impairment (34%) and prior malignancies (16%). Therefore, she emphasizes the importance of having a long-term follow-up to not only help confirm the findings from the real-world analysis but also to identify the drivers of non-relapse mortality. After this is established, the next step is to prevent these complications for the respective patient population, Lee concludes.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on the most recent and practice-changing oncology data


Latest CME