
Dr McGregor on the Rationale for the DAD Trial in Metastatic Urothelial Cancer
Bradley McGregor, MD, discusses the investigation of sacituzumab govitecan plus enfortumab vedotin in metastatic urothelial cancer.
Bradley McGregor, MD, senior physician, clinical director, Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and instructor of medicine, Harvard Medical School, discusses the rationale for conducting the phase 1 Double Antibody-Drug Conjugate (DAD) trial (NCT04724018) investigating sacituzumab govitecan-hziy (Trodelvy) in combination with enfortumab vedotin-ejfv (Padcev) for patients with treatment-resistant metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC).
The initial rationale for the DAD trial stemmed from the significant role that antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) play in the management of urothelial carcinoma, McGregor begins. Enfortumab vedotin and sacituzumab govitecan have both demonstrated efficacy and received approval in the United States for specific settings within urothelial carcinoma treatment.
These 2 ADCs have unique toxicities, different payloads, and target different antigens, suggesting a potential for complementary therapeutic effects, he expands. In oncology, combining different chemotherapy regimens is a common practice, aiming to enhance efficacy and overcome resistance. However, no prior clinical trial had investigated the simultaneous combination of two different ADCs in any type of cancer, McGregor states. The distinct mechanisms of action and non-overlapping toxicity profiles of enfortumab vedotin and sacituzumab govitecan provided a compelling rationale for their combination, he adds.
Results from the DAD trial were presented at the
By leveraging the unique properties of each ADC and their non-overlapping toxicities, the DAD trial aimed to determine the feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of this combination strategy, thereby paving the way for new therapeutic avenues in the treatment of mUC.



































