Commentary

Video

Dr Phull on the Rationale for the Retrospective Analysis of CAR T-Cell Therapy in R/R Myeloma

Author(s):

Pooja Phull, MD, discusses the rationale for assessing CAR T-cell therapy in the real-world vs trial setting in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

“It's important to see how [clinical trial data] compare to our real-world outcomes in our [patients with] multiple myeloma in the clinic that we're seeing every day, now that [the CARTITUDE-1 and KarMMA-1] trials have really matured, and we have a lot of long-term data on them.”

Pooja Phull, MD, hematologist/oncologist, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, discusses the rationale for assessing ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel; Carvykti) and idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel; Abecma) in real-world patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Within the past few years, CAR T-cell therapy has helped improve the treatment paradigm for patients with multiple myeloma in the short and long term, Phull begins. She notes that follow-up data from the phase 1b/2 CARTITUDE-1 (NCT03548207) and phase 2 KarMMA-1 (NCT03361748) trials have now matured, which provides a clearer picture of the respective long-term data.

Of note, the CARTITUDE-1 trial evaluated cilta-cel in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. At a median follow-up of 33.4 months, the median duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival were 33.9 months (95% CI, 25.5-not estimable [NE]), 34.9 months (95% CI, 25.2-NE), and not reached, respectively, according to final results of the study.

The KarMMA-1 study investigated ide-cel in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. At a median follow-up of 13.3 months, 73% of patients (n = 94/128) experienced a response, of which 33% had a complete response or better. Notably, the median DOR, PFS, and OS were 10.7 months (95% CI, 9.0-11.3), 8.8 months (95% CI, 5.6-11.6), and 19.4 months (95% CI, 18.2-NE), respectively.

Therefore, the retrospective analysis helped shed light on real-world data compared with known data from the 2 respective trials, Phull explains. She emphasizes that many patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the real-world setting often do not meet the eligibility criteria that are expected for clinical trials. Nevertheless, it’s crucial to compare these data to understand the effect of these CAR T-cell therapies in the real-world setting, Phull concludes.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on the most recent and practice-changing oncology data

Related Videos
Dr Fakih on the Future of Botensilimab and Balstilimab–Based Therapies in MSS mCRC
Alberto Montero, MD, MBA, CPHQ
Elizabeth Lee, MD, a gynecologic oncologist and the gynecologic oncology program's liaison to the Center for Cancer Therapeutics Innovation at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Taliya Lantsman, MD, a hematology/oncology fellow at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Alvaro Alencar, MD, discusses current unmet needs following the development of covalent BTK inhibitor resistance in CLL.
Melanie A. Sheen, MD
Raajit Rampal, MD, director of the Center for Hematologic Malignancies and director of the Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Program at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Shannon N. Westin, MD, MPH, FACOG, director, Early Drug Development, clinical medical director, professor, Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, Division of Surgery, codirector, Ovarian Cancer Moonshot Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center