Dr. Talwar on the Utility of Immunotherapy in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

Video

Vineet Talwar, DM, FRCP, DNB, FICP, FIMSA, MNAMS, discusses the utility of immunotherapy in metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Vineet Talwar, DM, FRCP, DNB, FICP, FIMSA, MNAMS, director, Department of Medical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, discusses the utility of immunotherapy in metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Data from key studies in urothelial carcinoma suggest that patients with high PD-L1 expression are more likely to benefit from immunotherapy compared with patients with no or low PD-L1 expression, Talwar says. However, PD-L1 is not thought to be a robust biomarker for response in urothelial cancer based on findings from the phase 3 IMvigor211 trial (NCT02807636), in which atezolizumab (Tecentriq) failed to improve overall survival compared with chemotherapy in patients with PD-L1–overexpressing urothelial carcinoma, says Talwar.

Despite these findings, it appears that PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden (TMB) are synergistic, meaning patients with high PD-L1 expression and high TMB should respond to immunotherapy, concludes Talwar.

Related Videos
Jeremy M. Pantin, MD, clinical director, Adult Transplant and Cellular Therapy Program, TriStar Centennial Medical Center, bone marrow transplant physician, Sarah Cannon Research Institute
Maria Hafez, MD, assistant professor, breast and sarcoma medical oncologist, director, Clinical Breast Cancer Research, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University
Zeynep Eroglu, MD
Sundar Jagannath, MBBS, director, Center of Excellence for Multiple Myeloma, professor of medicine (hematology and medical oncology), The Tisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai
Akriti Jain, MD
Raj Singh, MD
Gottfried Konecny, MD
Karim Chamie, MD, associate professor, urology, the University of California, Los Angeles
Mike Lattanzi, MD, medical oncologist, Texas Oncology
Ramez N. Eskander, MD