The FDA’s Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee voted 8-3 against approving a new drug application for quizartinib for adult patients with relapsed/refractory FLT3-ITD–positive acute myeloid leukemia.
The FDA’s Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC) voted 8-3 against approving a new drug application (NDA) for quizartinib for adult patients with relapsed/refractory FLT3-ITD—positive acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
The FDA is now scheduled to make a final decision on the NDA for the FLT3 inhibitor by August 25, 2019.
UPDATE 6/21/2019: FDA Issues Complete Response Letter for Quizartinib in AML
The NDA was filed based on findings from the phase III QuANTUM-R study, in which quizartinib reduced the risk of death by 24% compared with salvage chemotherapy in patients with FLT3-ITD—positive relapsed/refractory AML after first-line treatment with or without hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).1 At a median follow-up of 23.5 months, the median OS was 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.3-7.2) with quizartinib compared with 4.7 months (95% CI, 4.0-5.5) with salvage chemotherapy (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.58-0.98; stratified log-rank test, 1-sided P = .0177).
Prior to the ODAC meeting, the FDA conducted its own efficacy analysis, and determined the median OS was 26.9 weeks (95% CI, 23.1-31) with quizartinib compared with 20.4 weeks (95% CI, 17-25.2) with chemotherapy (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.59-0.99; P = .019).2
Although this analysis confirmed a benefit with quizartinib, the FDA explained in its ODAC briefing document that it found issues in its review raising concerns over the “credibility” and “generalizability” of the trial data.
These issues included, “imbalances in the rates of patients who were early-censored for OS (prior to week 8 after randomization) and in the number of patients randomized but not treated; inconsistent OS treatment effect by strata based on intensive versus low-intensity chemotherapy; confounding of the assessment of OS by the follow-on therapies which patients received after discontinuation from study treatment; and lack of treatment effect in additional efficacy endpoints.”
Patients on QuANTUM-R were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to once-daily quizartinib at 60 mg, with a 30-mg lead-in (n = 245) or to receive investigators’ choice of salvage chemotherapy that was selected prior to randomization. Chemotherapy choices included low-dose cytarabine (n = 29); the combination of mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine, (MEC; n = 40); or the combination of fludarabine, cytarabine and GCSF with idarubicin (FLAG-IDA; n = 53).
Baseline patient characteristics were well balanced across the treatment arms. The median patient age in the quizartinib arm was 55 years (range, 19-81) and 89% had and ECOG performance status of 0-1. Thirty-three percent of patients were refractory to prior therapy, 23% had relapsed after remission with HSCT, and 45% had relapsed after remission without HSCT.
The data submitted with the NDA showed that the median event-free survival (EFS) was 1.4 months (95% CI, 0.0-1.9) with quizartinib versus 0.9 months (95% CI, 0.4-1.3) with salvage chemotherapy (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.70-1.16; 1-sided, stratified log-rank P = .1071).
The internal FDA analysis also did not demonstrate a significant EFS benefit with quizartinib versus chemotherapy. The median EFS was 6.0 weeks (95% CI, 0.1-8.3) versus 3.7 weeks (95% CI, 0.4-6.0), respectively (HR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.71-1.16; P = .114).
The NDA data showed that the overall response rate was 69% with quizartinib versus 30% with salvage chemotherapy. The composite complete remission (CRc) rate was 48% versus 27% and the partial response rate was 21% versus 3%, respectively. The median duration of CRc was 12.1 weeks versus 5.0 weeks, respectively.
The FDA’s internal safety analysis of the QuANTUM-R study was mostly consistent with the safety findings included in the NDA, which listed the most common (≥10%) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in cycle 1 for quizartinib as nausea, anemia, electrocardiogram QT prolonged, thrombocytopenia, pyrexia, hypokalemia, febrile neutropenia, vomiting, fatigue, diarrhea, neutropenia, white blood cell count decreased, platelet count decreased, neutrophil count decreased, headache, and decreased appetite.
The NDA also listed AEs of special interest, including infection (77%), hemorrhage (49%), hepatic disorders (32%), QT prolongation (31%), cardiac arrhythmias (12%), and cardiac failure (2%).
In its ODAC briefing document, the FDA focused on cardiac toxicity as a key concern with quizartinib, noting the risk of cardiac AEs was substantially higher with quizartinib versus chemotherapy. Additional safety issues identified in the FDA safety analysis included potentially fatal differentiation syndrome, acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis, and prolonged cytopenias.
One of the 3 ODAC members who voted that the benefit of quizartinib outweighs the risks in this population was Philip C. Hoffman, MD, professor of Medicine, The University of Chicago Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine.
“In the realm of hematology/oncology, there are no patients sicker than acute leukemia patients, and no physicians more intensely watching the details than leukemia doctors, and so I’m not particularly worried that this cardiac safety question will somehow fall through the cracks. I agree with some of the others, that I don’t get the sense that, at least based on the data right now, that this is a blockbuster [drug], but it does seem like it’s one more agent in the armamentarium that can be useful in leukemia patients, perhaps as a way to get patients in sufficient remission to move toward a transplant,” said Hoffman.
“I voted no based on the data available. The efficacy results that we were shown are a modest 6 weeks. And if I felt confident in those data, that would have been enough for me in the setting of AML, but a lot of the questions that were raised with respect to bias, confounding, and I do think the issue of equipoise is a real one in the setting of this particular study—it raises questions about whether or not that survival benefit is real,” said Heidi D. Klepin, MD, associate professor of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology and Oncology, Wake Forest University Health Sciences.