What updated efficacy findings were seen in CheckMate 9DW?
Galle reported that the baseline characteristics were well balanced between the 2 arms.1 Most notably, 27% patients in the nivolumab/ipilimumab arm had Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer stage B or lower disease vs 26% of those in the control arm; Galle noted that the slightly higher rate in the investigational arm may have contributed to the positive results.
In the nivolumab/ipilimumab arm, the ORR was 36% (95% CI, 31%-42%), including a complete response rate of 8% and a partial response rate of 28%. These respective rates in the control arm were 13% (95% CI, 10%-17%), 2%, and 11%. The median time to response with nivolumab/ipilimumab was 2.2 months (range, 1.1-41.7) vs 3.7 months (range, 0.6-8.0). In the nivolumab/ipilimumab arm, the median DOR was 34.3 months (95% CI, 22.6-47.7), and 37% (95% CI, 24%-50%) of patients had a DOR lasting at least 48 months. In the control arm, the median DOR was 12.9 months (95% CI, 10.2-33.9), and 12% (95% CI, 1%-38%) of patients had a DOR lasting at least 48 months.
What was the updated safety profile of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in previously untreated, unresectable HCC?
Galle noted that the safety profile of nivolumab plus ipilimumab was consistent with prior reports and continued to be manageable with no new safety signals.
Among all treated patients, the median duration of treatment was 4.7 months (range, < 0.1-24.4) in the nivolumab/ipilimumab arm (n = 332) vs 6.9 months (range, < 0.1-50.6) in the control arm. In the nivolumab/ipilimumab arm, any-grade treatment-related adverse effects (TRAEs), serious TRAEs, and TRAEs leading to discontinuation were reported at rates of 83%, 28%, and 18%, respectively; the respective rates of grade 3/4 AEs in these categories were 41%, 25%, and 13%. In the control arm, the rates of any-grade AEs in these categories were 91%, 14%, and 10%; the respective rates of grade 3/4 AEs were 42%, 13%, and 6%. Notably, 12 treatment-related deaths occurred in the nivolumab/ipilimumab arm vs 3 in the control arm.
In the nivolumab/ipilimumab arm, the most common TRAEs included (hypertension (any-grade, 2%; grade 3/4, 0%), diarrhea (14%; 1%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) syndrome (2%; 0%), pruritus (28%; 2%), hypothyroidism (12%; 0%), decreased appetite (7%; < 1%), rash (20%; 2%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels (19%; 6%), increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels (19%; 5%), asthenia (10%; < 1%), fatigue (8%; 0%), decreased weight (2%; 0%), increased lipase levels (11%; 5%), nausea (6%; 0%), and hyperthyroidism (10%; < 1%). In the control arm, the most common TRAEs included (hypertension (any-grade, 42%; grade 3/4, 12%), diarrhea (35%; 3%), PPE syndrome (30%; 3%), pruritus (3%; 0%), hypothyroidism (26%; 0%), decreased appetite (22%; 2%), proteinuria (20%; 5%), rash (9%; < 1%), increased AST levels (9%; < 1%), increased ALT levels (6%; < 1%), asthenia (16%; 2%), fatigue (16%; 2%), decreased weight (11%; 2%), increased lipase levels (6%; 1%), nausea (10%; < 1%), and hyperthyroidism (1%; 0%).
Notably, among patients treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab, immune-mediated hepatitis occurred at any grade in 19% and grade 3/4 in 15%. In total, 17% of patients received high-dose steroids, and 6% of patients discontinued therapy due to this AE. The median time to onset of any-grade immune-mediated hepatitis was 6.0 weeks (range, 0.9-88.9). This event resolved in 75% of patients, and the median time to resolution was 10.3 weeks (range, 0.9-129.3+).
“That’s something we have to pay attention to, [and it] can be a problem, but if you intervene early on, it’s something quite manageable,” Galle explained.
Disclosures: Galle reported receiving honoraria from Adaptimmune, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Bayer Schering Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ipsen, MSD, Roche/Genentech, and Sirtex Medical; performing consulting or advisory roles for Adaptimmune, Bayer Schering Pharma, Boston Scientific, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lilly, MSD, Roche/Genentech, and Sirtex Medical; performing speakers’ bureau roles for AstraZeneca, Bayer Schering Pharma, BMS GmbH & Co. KG, Ipsen, Lilly, and Roche; receiving research funding from Roche/Genentech; and receiving coverage of travel, accommodations, or expenses from AstraZeneca, Bayer Schering Pharma, Lilly, Roche/Genentech, and Sirtex Medical.
References
- Galle PR, Sangro B, Decaens T, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs lenvatinib or sorafenib as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): 4-year follow-up of CheckMate 9DW. J Clin Oncol. 2026;44(suppl 2):LBA479. doi:10.1200/JCO.2026.44.2_suppl.LBA479
- FDA approves nivolumab with ipilimumab for unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma. FDA. April 11, 2025. Accessed January 12, 2026. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/fda-approves-nivolumab-ipilimumab-unresectable-or-metastatic-hepatocellular-carcinoma