Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in NSCLC

Video

For High-Definition, Click

The substantial benefits derived from treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors could have the most meaningful impact in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), believes Louis M. Weiner, MD. Effective treatments are desperately needed for this type of cancer, as the death rate from this disease is among the highest in the world.

The PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors have consistently demonstrated responses in the 20% to 25% range, notes Mark A. Socinski, MD. However, the duration is the most impressive aspect of these responses, as they tend to be long lasting.

The median age of patients with NSCLC is 71 with the existence of comorbidities, which places further importance on toxicity, notes Socinski. Without phase III data, it is difficult to compare the efficacy and toxicity between PD-1 and PD-L1-targeted agents in NSCLC, notes Roy S. Herbst, MD. However, targeting PD-L1 directly rather than PD-1 leaves PD-L2 intact. This prevents some side effects, such as colitis and pneumonitis, Herbst notes.

Biomarker analyses for patient selection remain unclear for these agents, Herbst notes. Trials have selected patients based on PD-L1 status with varying results. Responses are higher in PD-L1-positive patients; however, those with PD-L1-negative disease still respond to therapy.

Traditionally, the most effective approaches involve the combination of several therapies. However, combination strategies could be more difficult to find in NSCLC, since the population is older with more comorbidity, Herbst notes. For some patients (20% to 25%), the immune checkpoint inhibitor alone seems sufficient, Weiner notes. At this point, finding the patients who require further treatment remains an unmet need.

Related Videos
Sangeeta Goswami, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Pasi A. Jänne, MD, PhD, discusses an exploratory analysis from the FLAURA2 trial of osimertinib plus chemotherapy in treatment-naive, EGFR-mutant NSCLC.
Andrew Ip, MD
In this fifth episode of OncChats: Leveraging Immunotherapy in GI Malignancies, Toufic Kachaamy, MD, of City of Hope, Sunil Sharma, MD, of City of Hope, and Madappa Kundranda, MD, PhD, of Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, discuss next steps for research, including vaccination strategies, personalized cellular therapies, and more.
In this fourth episode of OncChats: Leveraging Immunotherapy in GI Malignancies, experts discuss research efforts being made with organoids to address existing questions with immunotherapy and the exploration of multimodality approaches to improve outcomes.
In this third episode of OncChats: Leveraging Immunotherapy in GI Malignancies, Toufic Kachaamy, MD, of City of Hope, Sunil Sharma, MD, of City of Hope, and Madappa Kundranda, MD, PhD, of Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, discuss the potential benefits of utilizing immunotherapy approaches earlier on in the disease course.
In this second episode of OncChats: Leveraging Immunotherapy in GI Malignancies, Toufic Kachaamy, MD, of City of Hope, Sunil Sharma, MD, of City of Hope, and Madappa Kundranda, MD, PhD, of Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, explain the challenges faced with preventing or detecting these cancers early and the understanding that is needed to develop effective early detection methods and move the needle forward.
In this first episode of OncChats: Leveraging Immunotherapy in GI Malignancies, Toufic Kachaamy, MD, of City of Hope, Sunil Sharma, MD, of City of Hope, and Madappa Kundranda, MD, PhD, of Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, discuss the potential for early detection multiomic assays and the work that still needs to be done to encourage their widespread use.
Arya Amini, MD