INV-1120 Proves Tolerable in Advanced Solid Tumors, Moves to Expansion in Combination With Pembrolizumab

Article

Treatment with INV-1120 was well tolerated and demonstrated preliminary signals of stable disease as a single agent in patients with advanced solid tumors.

solid tumors

Treatment with INV-1120 was well tolerated and demonstrated preliminary signals of stable disease as a single agent in patients with advanced solid tumors, according to results from a phase 1 trial (NCT04443088) presented during the 2022 SITC Annual Meeting.

Twenty-one of 24 patients were evaluable for efficacy at the cutoff date of May 30, 2022. Nine (42.9%) of those had stable disease.

Two patients (8.3%) had dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), both low-grade adverse effects (AEs) leading to more than 7 days of treatment interruption: grade 2 duodenal ulcer at 60 mg and grade 2 duodenitis at 200 mg.

“Single-agent INV-1120 was well tolerated in patients with advanced solid tumors. Five of 24 patients showed stable disease for at least 18 weeks and up to 64 weeks. With the support of preclinical data showing promising efficacy from combining an EP4 antagonist and anti–PD-1 [agent], a phase 1b [study] exploring the treatment of INV-1120 in combination with pembrolizumab is underway,” the study authors wrote in the poster.

PGE2 plays an important role in immunosuppression in cancer, and EP4, a G-protein coupled receptor is involved in suppressing innate and adaptive immune functions. INV-1120 is a highly selective, oral small molecule antagonist of the EP4 receptor for PGE2. In preclinical models, INV-1120 demonstrated antitumor activity alone and in combination with anti–PD-1 agents, as well as a favorable safety profile.

The study comprised a 3+3 design for dose escalation and evaluation of DLTs with 4-week treatment cycles. Eligible patients included those with advanced solid tumors including colorectal cancer (n = 8), lung cancer (n = 4), parotid adenocarcinoma (n = 2), sarcoma (n = 2), and others (n = 8).

The 6 dose levels, which were administered once daily, were as follows: 15 mg (n = 3), 30 mg (n = 3), 60 mg (n = 3-6), 100 mg (n = 3-6), 150 mg (n = 3-6), and 200 mg (n = 3-6).

The primary objective was the determination of the maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase 2 dose. Secondary objectives included the evaluation of pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy.

The median patient age was 58 years (range, 20-80) and most patients were female (n = 14; 58.3%). Twelve patients each had an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. Most patients had received at least 4 lines of prior therapy (n = 19; 79.2%), and 7 patients (29.2%) had received prior treatment with a checkpoint inhibitor.

Regarding safety, 95.8% of patients (n = 23) experienced treatment-emergent adverse effects (TEAEs; grade ≥3, n = 4; 16.7%). The most common any-grade TEAEs were diarrhea (n = 6; 25%), nausea (n = 6; 25%), anemia (n = 6; 25%), and fatigue (n = 5; 20.8%). Serious TEAEs occurred in 3 patients (12.5%), and drug-related TEAEs occurred in 13 patients (54.2%; grade ≥3, n = 1; 4.2%).

The primary cause of treatment discontinuation was progressive disease. Five patients (20.8%) discontinued treatment because of TEAEs, 2 of which were deemed unrelated to INV-1120.

“INV-1120 was rapidly absorbed across all doses, and time to maximum drug concentration was observed at approximately 2 hours post dose. The exposure of INV-1120 increased with the dose from 15 mg to 100/150 mg and plateaued thereafter,” the authors concluded.

Reference

Sarantopoulos J, Patnaik A, Zhu Y, et al. Preliminary safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetic results of EP4 antagonist INV-1120 from a first-in-human study in subjects with advanced solid tumors. Presented at: 2022 SITC Annual Meeting; November 8-12, 2022; Boston, MA. Abstract 597

Related Videos
In this fifth episode of OncChats: Leveraging Immunotherapy in GI Malignancies, Toufic Kachaamy, MD, of City of Hope, Sunil Sharma, MD, of City of Hope, and Madappa Kundranda, MD, PhD, of Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, discuss next steps for research, including vaccination strategies, personalized cellular therapies, and more.
In this fourth episode of OncChats: Leveraging Immunotherapy in GI Malignancies, experts discuss research efforts being made with organoids to address existing questions with immunotherapy and the exploration of multimodality approaches to improve outcomes.
In this third episode of OncChats: Leveraging Immunotherapy in GI Malignancies, Toufic Kachaamy, MD, of City of Hope, Sunil Sharma, MD, of City of Hope, and Madappa Kundranda, MD, PhD, of Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, discuss the potential benefits of utilizing immunotherapy approaches earlier on in the disease course.
In this second episode of OncChats: Leveraging Immunotherapy in GI Malignancies, Toufic Kachaamy, MD, of City of Hope, Sunil Sharma, MD, of City of Hope, and Madappa Kundranda, MD, PhD, of Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, explain the challenges faced with preventing or detecting these cancers early and the understanding that is needed to develop effective early detection methods and move the needle forward.
In this first episode of OncChats: Leveraging Immunotherapy in GI Malignancies, Toufic Kachaamy, MD, of City of Hope, Sunil Sharma, MD, of City of Hope, and Madappa Kundranda, MD, PhD, of Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, discuss the potential for early detection multiomic assays and the work that still needs to be done to encourage their widespread use.
Joachim G. J. V. Aerts, MD, PhD
Nathaniel Myall, MD
Martin Cannon, PhD, professor, Department of Microbiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences College of Medicine
Pedro Barata, MD, MSc
In this fourth episode of OncChats: Examining LIFU–Aided Liquid Biopsy in Glioblastoma, Manmeet Singh Ahluwalia, MD, and Michael W. McDermott, MD, discuss the key objectives of the phase 3 LIMITLESS study (NCT05317858) examining low-intensity focused ultrasound with immunotherapy and chemotherapy in patients with lung cancer and brain metastases.