New Guidelines Establish Recommendations for HER2 Testing for GEA

Article

An expert panel has issued a set of guidelines for patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, recommending that they be tested for HER2 status before initiation of targeted therapy.

Jaffer A. Ajani, MD

Jaffer A. Ajani, MD

Jaffer A. Ajani, MD

An expert panel has issued a set of guidelines for patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA), recommending that they be tested for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status before initiation of targeted therapy. HER2 is currently the only biomarker available for selecting patients with GEA for such therapies.

The panel, consisting of the College of American Pathologists (CAP), American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP), and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), issued a comprehensive set of 11 evidence-based recommendations for clinicians and pathologists to assist in the testing of HER2 status for patients with unresectable local-regional, recurrent, or metastatic GEA who are being considered to receive HER2-targeted therapy with trastuzumab (Herceptin).1

"As cancer care evolves to be increasingly personalized, this new guideline helps establish standards for when and how to accurately perform HER2 testing to guide treatment for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma patients," Jaffer A. Ajani, MD, who represented ASCO on the panel, said in a statement.

The authors noted that 7% to 38% of all GEAs demonstrate amplification and/or overexpression of HER2, although more overexpression is noted for tumors in the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) than for stomach cancer. HER2-directed therapy has shown increased survival over chemotherapy alone in patients with HER2-positive advanced GEA.

The panel conducted a thorough literature review of 116 articles published between January 2008 and June 2015 and produced a draft set of guidelines in December 2015. The authors requested public feedback before the guidelines were finalized.

For clinicians, the guidelines recommend that all patients with advanced GEA who may be candidates for HER2-directed therapies first be tested for HER2 status using tumor tissue from a biopsy or resection specimen. As an alternative, FNA specimen testing was also deemed possible, though there is less evidence available to support this claim.

In the frontline, the guidelines recommend that patients be treated with a combination of HER2-targeted therapy, trastuzumab, and chemotherapy.

"We encourage clinical teams around the world to adopt these guidelines," Mary Kay Washington, MD, PhD, who represented the ASCP on the panel, said in a statement. "It will help improve patient care by ensuring that only patients likely to benefit from HER2‐directed therapy are treated with trastuzumab."

Currently, trastuzumab is the only FDA-approved HER2-targeted therapy for the treatment of previously untreated patients with metastatic gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma with HER2 overexpression. The FDA approved the treatment in October 2010, when given in combination with cisplatin and a fluoropyrimidine, based on results of the ToGA trial.2

In the open-label, randomized, controlled phase III trial, trastuzumab showed an overall survival benefit of 2.7 months when added to chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone. Trastuzumab was also found to be well tolerated in the trial.

For pathologists, the guidelines recommend testing for HER2 status using immunohistochemistry (IHC) first, which was backed by a high degree of evidence. If the IHC score (0-3+) is a 2+, the results were considered to be ambiguous and pathologists should try in situ hybridization (ISH) testing next, although the recommendation for further ISH testing was not as strong as for IHC testing.

The final recommendation statement mentioned that there was insufficient evidence at this time for or against genomic testing in advanced GEA patients. The authors found conflicting evidence for the prognostic nature of HER2 as an association between HER2 amplification or overexpression and a poor prognosis in patients with GEA.

In the guidelines, the authors noted that the recommendations would be reviewed every 4 years and updated as needed.

References

  1. Bartley AN, Washington MK, Colasacco C, et al. HER2 testing and clinical decision making in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: guideline from the College of American Pathologists, American Society for Clinical Pathology, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology. [Published online November 14, 2016] J Clin Oncol. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.4836.
  2. Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, et al; ToGA trial investigators. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010. 376(9742):687-697. Doi; 10.1016/S0140-6736.
Related Videos
Arya Amini, MD
Adrianna Masters, MD, PhD,
Chul Kim, MD, MPH
Andrew Ip, MD
In this final episode of OncChats: Assessing the Promise of AI in Oncology, Toufic A. Kachaamy, MD, and Douglas Flora, MD, LSSBB, FACCC, discuss a roadmap of artificial intelligence (AI) advances in the next 5 to 10 years.
In this eighth episode of OncChats: Assessing the Promise of AI in Oncology, Toufic A. Kachaamy, MD, and Douglas Flora, MD, LSSBB, FACCC, explain how artificial intelligence tools are being developed to match the right patient to the right drug on the right clinical trial.
In this seventh episode of OncChats: Assessing the Promise of AI in Oncology, Toufic A. Kachaamy, MD, and Douglas Flora, MD, LSSBB, FACCC, discuss how artificial intelligence tools may be utilized to improve wait time for treatment, to provide more time for provider-patient interactions, and more.
In this final episode of OncChats: Reviewing Best Practices in the Surgical Management of Breast Cancer, Gladys Giron, MD, FACS, and Cristina Lopez-Peñalver, MD, shed light on clinical outcomes following surgery of the primary tumor in patients with stage IV breast cancer.
In this sixth episode of OncChats: Assessing the Promise of AI in Oncology, Toufic A. Kachaamy, MD, and Douglas Flora, MD, LSSBB, FACCC, discuss potential opportunities to leverage artificial intelligence tools in cancer screening, diagnosis, staging, and prognosis.
Christopher M. Gallagher, MD