All patients received nivolumab at 240 mg every 2 weeks for 4 doses, HDRBT via two 1150-cGy implants delivered 2 weeks apart, and EBRT at 45 Gy in 25 fractions.1 Nivolumab was initiated 4 weeks before the first HDRBT fraction to enable immune priming. A Decipher Prostate Genomic Classifier test was performed on all enrolled patients for correlative biomarker analysis.
The primary end point was the 2-year FFBR rate, with a prespecified historical control benchmark of 75%. Secondary end points included grade 3 or higher acute and late toxicity. Exploratory end points included major pathological response assessed by serial transperineal biopsies and evaluation of immune gene signatures as potential predictive biomarkers.
At baseline, the median age was 65.0 years (IQR, 57.0-69.0), and the median pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level was 9.7 ng/mL (IQR, 7.4-18.9). The median follow-up was 38.8 months (IQR, 31.0-46.5). Most patients (93.5%) had an ECOG performance status of 0, 74.2% had stage IIIC disease, and 3 patients (9.7%) had oligometastatic disease.
What additional efficacy and safety data were reported?
Six patients (19.3%) met the criteria for biochemical recurrence during follow-up, with 3 occurring within and 3 beyond the 2-year primary end point window. All 6 patients with biochemical recurrence also developed distant metastatic disease, yielding an overall metastasis rate of 19.3%. No patients experienced a local recurrence at any time point.
Sixteen patients (51.6%) were classified as early pathological responders and 15 (48.4%) as late responders, based on tumor clearance assessed by serial biopsies. Late responders experienced more rapid progression to distant metastasis, and all late responders with treatment failure developed multisite metastases (both bone and lymph nodes), whereas early responders with treatment failure had only a single site of metastasis.
A high Decipher Ricketts Immunosuppression Score (RIS) was significantly associated with early pathological response (area under the concentration curve [AUC], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.64-0.96; P < .010) and complete radiographic response (AUC, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61-0.96; P < .01). On multivariable analysis, low RIS was an independent predictor of metastatic disease progression (HR, 9.256; 95% CI, 1.061-80.719; P = .044), controlling for response group, ADT length, stage, and Gleason score.
In terms of safety, definitive and probable nivolumab-related toxicity included grade 2 acute adverse effects (AEs) in 6.3% of patients and grade 3 acute AEs in 6.3%, including 2 patients with grade 3 dose-limiting toxicities of autoimmune hepatitis and cardiac QT prolongation.
No grade 4 or higher nivolumab-related AEs were observed, and no late toxicities related to nivolumab were reported at any time point. Across all treatment-related events, 53.1% of patients experienced grade 2 acute toxicity, and 18.8% experienced grade 3 acute toxicity. Late effects were less common, and no grade 3 or higher late AEs were observed.
“Our findings support further investigation in a larger randomized phase 2/3 study appropriately powered to compare SOC trimodality therapy with and without nivolumab in GG5 prostate cancer,” Yamoah and colleagues wrote in their conclusion.
References
- Bryant JM, Sandoval M, Putney R, et al. Phase II trial of combination radiation, hormone, and immunotherapy in grade group 5 prostate cancer. J Immunother Cancer. 2026;14:e013906. doi:10.1136/jitc-2025-013906
- Combination of nivolumab immunotherapy with radiation therapy and androgen deprivation therapy. ClincalTrials.gov. Updated April 1, 2026. Accessed May 8, 2026. http://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03543189