News

Article

Orca-T Is Associated With Retrospective OS Improvement vs Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide in Advanced Hematologic Malignancies

Author(s):

Fact checked by:

Key Takeaways

  • Orca-T improved 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates compared to post-transplant cyclophosphamide in advanced hematologic malignancies.
  • Orca-T showed lower rates of GVHD and infections, with no significant age-related impact on OS.
SHOW MORE

Orca-T was associated with a retrospective survival improvement vs post-transplant cyclophosphamide in advanced hematologic malignancies.

Image credit:© TensorSpark – stock.adobe.com

Image credit:© TensorSpark – stock.adobe.com

Findings from a retrospective analysis revealed that the allogeneic T-cell immunotherapy Orca-T was associated with an improvement in overall survival (OS) compared with post-transplant cyclophosphamide in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies. Data were presented at the 51st Annual EBMT Meeting.1

The retrospective analysis included selected patients who received Orca-T during a phase 1b trial (NCT04013685) and a cohort of registry-derived patients given post-transplant cyclophosphamide. Findings showed that patients treated with Orca-T (n = 77) experienced 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates of 96% (95% CI, 88%-99%), 88% (95% CI, 78%-94%), and 86% (95% CI, 73%-92%), respectively. In the post-transplant cyclophosphamide cohort, these respective rates were 82% (95% CI, 78%-87%), 73% (95% CI, 68%-79%), and 67% (95% CI, 61%-74%).

“The increased survival was maintained through 1-, 2-, and 3-year comparisons,” lead study author Arpita P. Gandhi, MD, MS, said in a presentation of the data. “Historically, T-cell reduction has provided graft-vs-host disease [GVHD] control but higher [rates of] infection and lower survival. Orca-T exhibited low [rates of] GVHD, low infections, and high survival in the context of a single-arm phase 1b trial.”

Gandhi is an assistant professor of medicine in the Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology in the School of Medicine at Oregon Health & Science University in Portland.

Setting the Stage for the Retrospective Analysis

In the phase 1b study evaluating Orca-T, investigators enrolled patients 18 to 75 years of age with high-risk hematologic malignancies in complete response (CR), including acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia, high- or very high–risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), or myelofibrosis. Patients needed to be eligible for myeloablative conditioning; have a hematopoietic cell transplantation–specific comorbidity index score of 4 or less; have a Karnofsky performance status of at least 70; and have adequate organ function.

In the single-arm study, patients underwent myeloablative conditioning on days –10 to –2 prior to receiving Orca-T. Infusion of the immunotherapy comprised hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells at a dose of 3 x 106 on day 0; conventional T cells at a dose of 3 x 106 on day +2; and single-agent tacrolimus at a target dose of 5 to 10 ng/mL on day +3. Notably, patients did not receive methotrexate, post-transplant cyclophosphamide, or other immunosuppressive therapies.

The trial’s primary end points were the rate of dose-limiting toxicities and the incidence of primary graft failure through day +28.

Previously reported data from the study showed that evaluable patients (n = 150) achieved 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates of 88% (95% CI, 83%-94%), 80% (95% CI, 74%-87%), and 76% (95% CI, 69%-84%), respectively. Two percent of patients experienced primary graft failure, and no patients had secondary graft failure. Moderate-to-severe GVHD was reported in 13% of patients, and 5% had grade 3 or higher acute GVHD. Infections included grade 1 to 3 (28%), grade 4 (5%), and grade 5 (1%). The non-relapse mortality rate was 9%.

Building the Retrospective Cohorts

To conduct the retrospective analysis, investigators selected cohorts of patients from the Orca-T phase 1b study (n = 154) and patients from a post-transplant cyclophosphamide comparator arm (n = 2585). The groups evaluated in the analysis were selected based on date of treatment, HLA match status, age, disease type, conditioning, and GVHD prophylaxis, which created the final Orca-T (n = 77) and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (n = 293) arms.

Among patients included in the retrospective analysis, the median age was 49 years (interquartile range [IQR], 39-58) in the Orca-T arm vs 48 years (IQR, 37-58) in the post-transplant cyclophosphamide arm. The majority of patients were male (Orca-T, 57%; post-transplant cyclophosphamide, 57%), had myeloid malignancies such as AML or MDS (70%; 72%), had intermediate-risk disease (65%; 64%), were in first CR (60%; 63%), had matched-unrelated donors (52%; 85%), were White (68%; 84%), and were not Hispanic or Latino (75%; 82%). The median follow-up was 33 months (range, 5-54) for the Orca-T arm and 24 months (range, 0-53) for the post-transplant cyclophosphamide arm.

Additional Retrospective Data

Further data from the retrospective analysis demonstrated that age had no significant impact on OS. In patients 50 years of age or younger, the 1-year OS rates were 95% (95% CI, 88%-100%) for Orca-T (n = 39) vs 86% (95% CI, 81%-92%) for post-transplant cyclophosphamide (n = 170). In those over 50 years of age, the 1-year OS rates were 97% (95% CI, 92%-100%) for Orca-T (n = 38) vs 77% (95% CI, 70%-85%) for post-transplant cyclophosphamide (n = 123).

The 1-year non-relapse mortality rate was 2% for the Orca-T group compared with 8% for the post-transplant cyclophosphamide group. The 1-year relapse-free survival rate was 83% and 71% for Orca-T and post-transplant cyclophosphamide, respectively.

Orca-T was further investigated vs conventional allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies the phase 3 Precision-T trial (NCT05316701), and findings from the study showed that Orca-T led to an improvement in the rate of moderate-to-severed chronic GVHD, meeting the trial’s primary end point.2 Full data from Precision-T will be presented on Tuesday at the 51st Annual EBMT Meeting.

References

  1. Gandhi AP, Srour SA, Oliai C, et al. Observational comparison of overall survival between phase 1b Orca-T and registry-based post-transplant cyclophosphamide patients. Presented at: 51st Annual EBMT Meeting; March 30 to April 2, 2025; Florence, Italy. Abstract OS3-04.
  2. Orca Bio announces positive results from the pivotal phase 3 study of investigational Orca-T compared to allogeneic stem cell transplant for the treatment of hematologic malignancies. News release. Orca Bio. March 17, 2025. Accessed March 31, 2025. https://orcabio.com/orca-bio-announces-positive-results-from-the-pivotal-phase-3-study-of-investigational-orca-t-compared-to-allogeneic-stem-cell-transplant-for-the-treatment-of-hematologic-malignancies/

Newsletter

Stay up to date on the most recent and practice-changing oncology data

Latest CME

View All
18th Annual Interdisciplinary Prostate Cancer Congress® and Other Genitourinary Malignancies
Video

18th Annual Interdisciplinary Prostate Cancer Congress® and Other Genitourinary Malignancies

Apr 8th 2025 - May 14th 2025

online-activity
Updates and Innovations in Nonopioid Pain Management Strategies for Breast Cancer Patients Postsurgical Intervention
Video

Updates and Innovations in Nonopioid Pain Management Strategies for Breast Cancer Patients Postsurgical Intervention

Apr 7th 2025 - Apr 8th 2026

online-activity
Community Oncology Connections™: Contextualizing Novel Immunotherapy for Advanced Melanoma – How Do TIL Therapies Fit into Practice? | Arkansas
Video

Community Oncology Connections™: Contextualizing Novel Immunotherapy for Advanced Melanoma – How Do TIL Therapies Fit into Practice? | Arkansas

Apr 3rd 2025 - May 9th 2025

online-activity