Pirtobrutinib Granted Approval for R/R CLL/SLL by NMPA
- The NMPA in China approved pirtobrutinib based on efficacy data from the phase 3 BRUIN CLL-321 trial (NCT04666038).
- Data from the trial also supported the FDA approval of pirtobrutinib in relapsed or refractory CLL and SLL in December 2025.
- Patients in the pirtobrutinib arm experienced a median PFS of 14 months compared with 8.7 months in those who received IR or BR.
Qiu is a professor and head of the Lymphoma and Myeloma Center at the China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences in Beijing.
How was BRUIN CLL-321 designed?
The randomized, open-label study enrolled patients with relapsed/refractory CLL/SLL who had received prior covalent BTK inhibition. Patients also needed to have an ECOG performance status of 2 or less and an absolute neutrophil count of 0.75 x 109/L or less.2
If patients had a history of drug-related liver injuries, prior Richter transformation, history of involvement of the central nervous system, or cardiovascular disease, they were not included in the trial.
Patients received once-daily oral pirtobrutinib at 200 mg or at IR or BR per the labeled dosages.1
PFS per the 2018 International Workshop on CLL criteria was the trial’s end point. Secondary end points for the trial were overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), event-free survival (EFS), time to next treatment (TTNT), safety, and overall survival (OS).
“The approval of pirtobrutinib for the CLL/SLL indication in China marks an important milestone in the treatment journey for Chinese [patients with] CLL/SLL. It means that patients who continue to experience disease progression after covalent BTK inhibitor therapy can now gain timely access to this globally innovative treatment option,” Li Wang, MD, PhD, added in the news release.
Wang is a senior vice president and the head of Lilly China Drug Development and Medical Affairs Center, both for Eli Lilly China in Shanghai.
What were the additional data for pirtobrutinib in R/R CLL/SLL?
Previously reported data from the trial showed patients in the pirtobrutinib arm achieving an 18-month OS rate of 73.4% (95% CI, 63.9%-80.7%), whereas patients who received IR or BR demonstrated a rate of 70.8% (95% CI, 60.9%-78.7%).3
Regarding safety, the most common TEAEs in the pirtobrutinib arm were anemia (20.7%), pneumonia (19.8%), neutropenia (16.4%), and diarrhea (15.5%). Common TEAEs for patients in the IR or BR arm were diarrhea (29.4%), pyrexia (25.7%), nausea (20.2%), fatigue (18.3%), and COVID-19 (18.3%). Notably, dose reductions due to TEAEs were lower in the pirtobrutinib arm (7.8% vs 28.4%), in addition to grade 3 or higher TEAEs (55.2% vs 71.6%).
“The approval in China for CLL/SLL represents a significant breakthrough in this field, which ensures that [patients with] CLL/SLL in China have timely access to this global therapeutic innovation,” Hui Zhou, MD, PhD, added in the news release.
Zhou is the chief of research and development in oncology at Innovent Biologics in Suzhou, China.
References
- Jaypirca (pirtobrutinib) approved in China for the treatment of relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma. News release. Innovent Biologics. March 1, 2026. Accessed March 2, 2026. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/jaypirca-pirtobrutinib-approved-in-china-for-the-treatment-of-relapsed-or-refractory-chronic-lymphocytic-leukemia-or-small-lymphocytic-lymphoma-302699561.html
- Study of LOXO-305 (Pirtobrutinib) versus investigator's choice (idelalisib plus rituximab or bendamustine plus rituximab) in patients with previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) (BRUIN CLL-321). ClincalTrials.gov. Updated April 20, 2025. Accessed March 2, 2026. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04666038
- Sharman JP, Munir T, Grosicki S, et al. BRUIN CLL-321: randomized phase III trial of pirtobrutinib versus idelalisib plus rituximab (IdelaR) or bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) in BTK inhibitor pretreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma. Blood. 2024;144(suppl 1):886-886. doi:10.1182/blood-2024-198147