Video

Radioembolization With Chemotherapy for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Randomized, Open-Label, International, Multicenter, Phase III Trial

Author(s):

Expert Riad Salem, MD, MBA, highlights key data from the phase 3 EPOCH study, which evaluated TheraSphere in patients with mCRC and liver metastases who failed first line chemotherapy.

Riad Salem, MD, discusses data from the following presentation:

  • Radioembolization With Chemotherapy for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Randomized, Open-Label, International, Multicenter, Phase III Trial. (Mulcahy MF, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Sep 20: JCO2101839)
  • EPOCH is the first positive phase 3 global study of Y-90 [Yttrium 90] TARE [Transarterial radioembolization] and chemotherapy in the second-line treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases.
  • This study examined safety and efficacy in patients with unresectable unilobar or bilobar colorectal metastases who were able to receive second-line irinotecan- or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.
  • Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive Y-90 glass TARE and standard-of-care chemotherapy with or without targeted therapy (n=215) or standard of care chemotherapy with or without targeted therapy (n=213). Follow-up occurred every 8 weeks until disease progression or hepatic disease progression or death.
  • Primary end points were PFS [progression-free survival] and hPFS [hepatic PFS] adjudicated by BICR [blinded independent central review]. Secondary end points were OS [overall survival], ORR [overall response rate] by BICR, DCR [disease control rate] by BICR, TTSP [time to symptomatic progression], and TTDQoL [time to deterioration quality of life].
  • Safety/Efficacy Results:
    • The addition of Y-90 TARE to chemotherapy increased PFS from 7.2 to 8.0 months and increased hPFS from 7.2 to 9.1 months; these increases were statistically significant, and the study success criteria were met (PFS: HR 0.69; 1-sided P = .0013; hPFS: HR 0.59; 1-sided P < 0.0001).
    • No significant differences were found in OS.
    • Overall response rate in the TARE-chemotherapy group was nominally better than the chemotherapy alone group.
    • Chemotherapy-related adverse events were comparable between the groups.
    • No new, unexpected safety signals.
    • Y-90 did not compromise ability to receive additional chemotherapy.
Related Videos
Management of Patients With Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS) in a Large US Community Oncology Practice: A Focus on Patient Outcomes Post Erythropoietin Stimulating Agent (ESA) Treatment
Combination of Zanubrutinib + Venetoclax for Treatment-naive CLL/SLL With del(17p) and/or TP53: Preliminary Results From SEQUOIA Arm D
Chun Chao, PhD, MS
Preliminary Efficacy and Safety of the Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Degrader BGB-16673 in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory CLL/SLL: Results From the Phase 1 BGB-16673-101 Study
Results from the randomized phase 3 DREAMM-8 study of belantamab mafodotin plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone (BPd) vs pomalidomide plus bortezomib and dexamethasone (PVd) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)
utinib vs. Acalabrutinib in B-Cell Malignancies: An Adverse Event-Based Economic Analysis
Indirect Comparison of Efficacy of Zanubrutinib Versus Acalabrutinib in the Treatment of Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Efficacy and Safety of Fruquintinib in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer According to Prior Treatment Sequence in the Refractory Setting: Results From FRESCO and FRESCO-2
Richard Kim, MD
Salman R. Punekar, MD