Your AI-Trained Oncology Knowledge Connection!


Video

Risk Stratification: Primary Myelofibrosis

An overview of risk stratification models available to assess and classify patients with primary myelofibrosis.

Pankit Vachhani, MD: There are several risk stratification schemas for patients with primary myelofibrosis. In the modern treatment landscape, we have been used to using the IPSS [International Prognostic Scoring Score] risk stratification schema. That incorporates 5 different factors into it: the first is peripheral blood blasts, second is the hemoglobin level, third is white blood cell count level, fourth is constitutional symptoms, and fifth is the age of the patient. In addition to that, there is also the DIPSS [Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System] and DIPSS Plus risk stratification system. What the DIPSS and DIPSS Plus do is allow for a more dynamic assessment of any individual patient’s risk. We typically use the IPSS risk stratification schema at the time of diagnosis. One could also use DIPSS or DIPSS Plus then, but in order to follow the patients after the point of starting treatment, one typically uses DIPSS or DIPSS Plus.

In addition, if someone happens to have the genetic information of a patient at the time of diagnosis, and that genetic information could be the carrier type and the molecular mutations obtained through next-generation sequencing panels, you may want to utilize the MIPSS70 [Mutation-Enhanced International Prognostic Scoring System for Transplantation-Age Patients] or MIPSS70 Plus risk scoring stratification. MIPSS70 incorporates more factors, and in particular, the genetic factors, into the schema. If you have patients who had essential thrombocytosis [ET] or polycythemia vera [PV] that progressed into myelofibrosis—and in doing that, would have secondary myelofibrosis—one may want to consider using the MYSEC-PM [Myelofibrosis Secondary to PV and ET-Prognostic Model] risk stratification schema. This was specifically designed for patients who have post-ET or post-PV myelofibrosis.

TRANSCRIPT EDITED FOR CLARITY

Newsletter

Stay up to date on the most recent and practice-changing oncology data

Related Videos
Seema A. Bhat, MD, a hematologist at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center—James; as well as an assistant professor in the Department of Internal Medicine in the Division of Hematology at The Ohio State University
Raajit Rampal, MD, director of the Center for Hematologic Malignancies and director of the Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Program at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
6369343864112
Dr Kishtagari on Pelabresib Plus Ruxolitinib in JAK Inhibitor–Naive Myelofibrosis
Al Malki
Dr Sekkeres on the Association Between Smoking and Disease Progression in MDS
Amer Zeidan, MBBS, and Guillermo Garcia-Manero, MD, discuss the potential for the use of oral HMAs in MDS.
Amer Zeidan, MBBS, and Guillermo Garcia-Manero, MD, discuss the implications of the FDA approval of imetelstat for transfusion-dependent anemia in MDS.
Amer Zeidan, MBBS, and Guillermo Garcia-Manero, MD, discuss other potential roles for luspatercept in MDS and beyond.
Amer Zeidan, MBBS, and Guillermo Garcia-Manero, MD, discuss long-term transfusion independence data for luspatercept in MDS.