The Awake Craniotomy Presents Advantages in Resection of Eloquent Cortex Brain Tumors

Oncology Live®December 2013
Volume 14
Issue 12

In Partnership With:

Awake craniotomies are traditionally reserved for, but not limited to, tumors involving the primary motor and speech areas

Arnold B. Etame, MD, PhD

Neurological Surgeon and Scientist

Moffitt Cancer Center,

Tampa, FL

Awake craniotomies are traditionally reserved for, but not limited to, tumors involving the primary motor (Figure 1) and speech (Figure 2) areas. Patients are typically conscious during most of the procedure, which is often carried out in the absence of general anesthesia. Local anesthesia in the form of a scalp block with mild intermittent sedation is often sufficient.

During the operation, intraoperative mapping is often performed and remains the gold standard for delineation of the relationship of tumor to eloquent cortex.1-3 Hence, activation of motor activity or disruption of speech during electrical stimulation strongly suggests that the stimulated area is critical and necessary for functional preservation. Similarly, patients are tested functionally during tumor resection, which is often terminated if at any point the patient develops deficits related to the area of eloquence. Accordingly, awake craniotomies are often associated with great functional outcomes.4-6 Awake craniotomies undoubtedly achieve superior extent of resection in eloquent regions when compared to standard craniotomies that employ general anesthesia for similar lesions.4,6 The availability of intraoperative mapping and functional delineation provides reasonable confidence with tumor resection.

Awake craniotomy has additional advantages over standard craniotomy with general anesthesia. A recent review of 951 patients, some of whom underwent awake craniotomy (n = 411) and others standard craniotomy (n = 540), documented much shorter hospital stays and quick functional recovery within the group treated with awake craniotomy.7 Shorter hospital stays realized with awake craniotomy translate into decreased hospital expenses.8

Figure 1.

Figure 1. A malignant glioma with associated corticospinal motor fibers involving the motor cortex area of the left frontal lobe, hence a candidate for an awake craniotomy for tumor resection.

Figure 2.

Figure 2. A malignant glioma with associated white matter fibers involving the left temporal lobe in a patient with speech symptoms, thus a candidate for an awake craniotomy for tumor resection.

Patient comfort during surgery, especially with respect to minimizing fatigue, is always a critical component of awake craniotomy, since patient cooperation is vital to the surgical outcome. Studies assessing the subjective experiences of patients during awake craniotomy for the most part demonstrate reasonable tolerance for the procedure.9,10 Incorporation of intermittent sedation can be very valuable as well. The scalp blocks with long-acting local anesthetics do provide reasonable intraoperative and postoperative pain control.11 The reduced need for postoperative intravenous narcotics with awake craniotomy minimizes the likelihood of narcotic- related side effects.

At our cancer center, we have an established awake-craniotomy program for tumors in eloquent cortex. The program is largely a collaborative effort between neurosurgical oncology, anesthesia, clinical neuropsychology, and neurophysiology. Patients receive educational information regarding what the procedure entails and potential expectations. On average, we perform four to five awake craniotomies monthly for primary brain tumors and brain metastases, as well as for symptomatic steroid-refractory radiation necrosis adjacent to eloquent cortex. Overall, patients report adequate pain control and universal satisfaction with comfort during surgery. Moreover, more than 80% are discharged on the first postoperative day. The feasible synergy between image-guided stereotactic surgery and awake craniotomies has resulted in the desired outcome of safe maximum resection in patients with malignant tumors within eloquent regions of the brain.


  1. Berger MS, Ojemann GA. Intraoperative brain mapping techniques in neuro-oncology. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1992;58(1-4):153-161.
  2. Black PM, Ronner, SF. Cortical mapping for defining the limits of tumor resection. Neurosurgery. 1987;20(6):914-919.
  3. Walsh AR, Schmidt RH, Marsh HT. Cortical mapping and local anaesthetic resection as an aid to surgery of low and intermediate grade gliomas. Br J Neurosurg. 1992;6(2):119-124.
  4. De Benedictis A, Moritz-Gasser S, Duffau H. Awake mapping optimizes the extent of resection for low-grade gliomas in eloquent areas. Neurosurgery. 2010;66(6):1074-1084.
  5. Duffau H, Moritz-Gasser S, Gatignol P. Functional outcome after language mapping for insular World Health Organization Grade II gliomas in the dominant hemisphere: experience with 24 patients. Neurosurg Focus. 2009;27(2):E7.
  6. Sacko O, Lauwers-Cances V, Brauge D, et al. Awake craniotomy vs surgery under general anesthesia for resection of supratentorial lesions. Neurosurgery. 2011;68(5):1192-1198.
  7. Brown T, Shah AH, Bregy A, et al. Awake craniotomy for brain tumor resection: the rule rather than the exception? J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2013;25(3):240-247.
  8. Peruzzi P, Bergese SD, Viloria A, et al. A retrospective cohort-matched comparison of conscious sedation versus general anesthesia for supratentorial glioma resection. Clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2011;114(3):633-639.
  9. Whittle IR, Midgley S, Georges H, et al. Patient perceptions of “awake” brain tumour surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2005;147(3):275-277.
  10. Danks RA, Rogers M, Aglio LS, et al. Patient tolerance of craniotomy performed with the patient under local anesthesia and monitored conscious sedation. Neurosurgery. 1998;42(1):28-34.
  11. Grossman R, Ram Z, Perel A, et al. Control of postoperative pain after awake craniotomy with local intradermal analgesia and metamizol. Isr Med Assoc J. 2007;9(5):380-382.

Related Videos
A panel of 4 experts on hematologic malignancies
A panel of 4 experts on hematologic malignancies
Dae Won Kim, MD, Gastrointestinal Oncology Program, Moffitt Cancer Center
A panel of 6 experts on colorectal cancer
A panel of 6 experts on colorectal cancer
John Michael Bryant, MD,
A panel of 6 experts on follicular lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma seated at a long desk
Rachid Baz, MD, section head, Myeloma, Department of Malignant Hematology, Moffitt Cancer Center; co-director, Pentecost Family Myeloma Research Center
A panel of 4 experts on hematologic malignancies
A panel of 6 experts on chronic lymphocytic leukemia seated at a long desk