Opinion|Videos|October 18, 2024
Use of monotherapy (IO or TKI) or localized treatment in First Line
Panelists discuss the circumstances under which monotherapy with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor or immunotherapy would be preferred in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series
Video content above is prompted by the following:
When would you choose monotherapy with either a tyrosine kinase inhibitor or immunotherapy?
Advertisement
Related to this article
Researchers at Wake Forest University School of Medicine identified a protein that may help breast cancer spread to the brain and evade immune defenses.
Benjamin Weinberg, MD, discusses the FDA approval of daraxonrasib, RASolute 302 survival data, safety considerations, and future RAS-targeted therapies in pancreatic cancer.
Half of lenalidomide-refractory patients with 1 to 3 prior lines remained alive and progression free at least 5 years after a single cilta-cel infusion.
Andrew Kuykendall, MD, discusses the FDA approval of rusfertide and how to apply it in clinical practice for polycythemia vera management.
An NDA seeks FDA approval of savolitinib plus osimertinib for EGFR-mutated NSCLC with MET overexpression or amplification after EGFR TKI therapy.
Jason Hafron, MD, discusses the emotional, clinical, and financial burden of false positive cancer screening results and improved risk stratification.
Raajit K. Rampal, MD, PhD, discusses JAK inhibitor choice in cytopenic myelofibrosis, emerging combinations, and anemia-directed agents.
The sNDA for elinzanetant seeks FDA approval for moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms in women receiving endocrine therapy for HR-positive breast cancer.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on OncLive
1
China's NMPA Approves Pirtobrutinib Across CLL
2
FDA Grants Priority Review to Elinzanetant for Endocrine Therapy–Associated Vasomotor Symptoms in HR+ Breast Cancer
3
Long-Term PERSEUS Data Confirm Durable PFS Benefit With D-VRd in Transplant-Eligible Newly Diagnosed Myeloma
4
Calculating the Real Cost of False Positive Findings in Cancer Screening
5