
Opinion|Videos|January 16, 2025
When to Choose Narrow Panel Testing Over Comprehensive Testing in Biomarker Analysis
Author(s)Vivek Subbiah, MD, Lucio N. Gordan, MD
Panelists discuss how comprehensive genomic testing may not be practical for well-understood tumors with established treatment pathways. Narrow panel testing is preferred when specific mutations guide therapy (like EGFR in lung cancer) or when time/cost constraints exist.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Video series above is prompted by the following:
- Are there scenarios where comprehensive testing might be unnecessary or less practical (certain tumor types)?
- In which scenarios might you prefer narrow panel testing over comprehensive testing?
Advertisement
Related to this article

Breast oncologists weigh the future role of radiographic progression vs liquid biopsy in the timing of therapeutic shifts in metastatic breast cancer.

Drs Nunnery and Iyengar discuss FAQs about the metabolic effects of breast cancer therapy and the expanding role of GLP-1 receptor agonists in oncology.

In a recent OncLive Peer Exchange, expert investigators discussed the utility of ctDNA and MRD testing in solid tumors.

The European Union approved trastuzumab deruxtecan for previously treated, HER2-postive metastatic solid tumors.

The top 5 OncLive TV videos of the week cover insights in breast cancer, lymphoma, melanoma, prostate cancer, and ovarian cancer.

The FDA has approved new sacituzumab govitecan indications in TNBC, cleared palbociclib combination maintenance treatment in HER2-positive breast cancer, and more.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on OncLive
1
Epcoritamab Plus Lenalidomide/Rituximab Win EU Approval for R/R Follicular Lymphoma
2
Adagrasib Plus Cetuximab Misses OS, PFS End Points in Pretreated KRAS G12C–Mutated CRC
3
Phase 1 Data Highlight Potential Utility for In Vivo CAR T-Cell Therapy in R/R Myeloma
4
FDA Issues CRL to Orviglance for Liver Metastasis Imaging in Patients With Severe Kidney Impairment
5
