When to Consider Referral to a Genetic Counselor for Lesser Known Cancer Syndromes | OncLive

When to Consider Referral to a Genetic Counselor for Lesser Known Cancer Syndromes

Experts discuss the clinical features, gene function, and medical management recommendations for six hereditary cancer syndromes.


This article reviews two newly described cancer syndromes: DICER1 and BAP1 tumor predisposition syndrome, and four uncommon syndromes: Familial Atypical Multiple Mole Melanoma (FAMMM) syndrome, Hereditary Leiomyomatosis and Renal Cell Cancer (HLRCC) syndrome, Cowden syndrome (CS), and von Hippel Lindau (VHL) disease which can be under-recognized in an oncology practice. Clinical features and indications for testing are reviewed to help oncologists identify patients appropriate for genetic evaluation. Medical management recommendations and notable counseling points, such as potential for pediatric risk are detailed to highlight the importance of testing for patients and families.


Over 200 hereditary cancer syndromes have been described, with the majority being rare or uncommon. These syndromes are almost certainly under-reported given the broad range and variable expressivity of the associated features. The advent of next generation sequencing has enabled greater access to testing and has led to the discovery that at least some of these syndromes are more common than previously thought.

The major benefit of cancer genetic testing is that it can lead to personalized treatment, screening, and risk reducing strategies for patients and their families. Oncologists are often the first-line providers in helping to recognize patients with inherited cancer syndromes and are increasingly integrating genetic test results in the care of their patients. While referrals to cancer genetics are diverse in nature, some indications include: patients with rare tumor types, patients diagnosed with cancer at younger than typical ages, patients diagnosed with multiple primary cancers, patients who do not have cancer, but do have at least one relative with a rare tumor or at least two relatives with related cancers or multiple primaries, and/or patients who have a known gene mutation in the family.

In this review, we discuss the clinical features, gene function, and medical management recommendations for six hereditary cancer syndromes. This includes two newly described syndromes: DICER1 and BAP1 tumor predisposition syndrome, and four under-recognized syndromes: Familial Atypical Multiple Mole Melanoma (FAMMM) syndrome, Hereditary Leiomyomatosis and Renal Cell Cancer (HLRCC) syndrome, Cowden syndrome (CS), and von Hippel Lindau (VHL) disease.

DICER1 Syndrome

DICER1 syndrome is an autosomal dominant hereditary cancer syndrome.1 The most common features of DICER1 syndrome are pleuropulmonary blastomas (PPB), cystic nephromas, and ovarian sex-cord stromal tumors, especially Sertoli Leydig2-4. Other associated tumors include embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas of the uterine cervix and other sites, nasal chondromesenchymal hamartomas, cerebral and ciliary body medulloepitheliomas, pituitary blastoma, Wilms’ tumor, bladder cancer, and thyroid cancer.4-9 Juvenile hamartomatous intestinal polyps, multinodular goiter, and thyroid, lung, and kidney cysts are also seen.9

The cancer risk is highest in early childhood, in large part due to the PPB risk with the majority of DICER1-associated tumors occurring before age 40.1 DICER1 syndrome is newly described and information about associated cancer risks is still emerging. The DICER1-related lifetime tumor risk seems to be 50% for females and 20% for males.1,10 Individuals who have personal and/or family histories of PPB, cystic nephroma, ovarian sex-cord stromal tumor, nasal chondromesenchymal hamartoma, medulloepitheliomas, pituitary blastoma, and/or embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma of the uterine cervix should be offered DICER1 genetic testing.1,4,9

DICER1 is a ribonuclease responsible for producing short-interfering RNA and microRNA (miRNA) that regulate post-translational gene expression.2,4,10 Aberrant DICER1 function results in oncogenic miRNA, which does not require loss of the wild-type allele or a second-hit for disease development.9

Management for infants and children with DICER1 syndrome includes complete physical exams, chest CT scans, chest x-rays, and renal ultrasound exams. Older children and adults with DICER1 syndrome should have clinical thyroid exams and possibly thyroid ultrasound scans.1,3

BAP1 Tumor Predisposition Syndrome

BAP1 (BRCA1 associated protein-1) tumor predisposition syndrome is an autosomal dominant inherited cancer syndrome. Germline BAP1 mutations are associated with an increased risk for atypical melanocytic tumors, cutaneous and uveal melanoma, mesothelioma, and renal cell carcinomas,11, 12. The atypical melanocytic lesions resemble Spitz nevi and have been characterized as “atypical Spitz tumors” (ASTs), although they have a unique histology and exhibit both BRAF and BAP1 mutations.13, 14

One study found 8% of patients with metastatic uveal melanoma to carry a germline BAP1 mutation.15 The exact spectrum of BAP1 associated malignancies and the extent of risk to develop these malignancies continues to evolve. A referral to genetics should be considered for individuals with a personal or family history of: metastatic uveal melanoma; non-metastatic uveal melanoma and cutaneous melanoma; cutaneous melanoma and mesothelioma; >1 mesothelioma diagnoses.

BAP1 is a deubiquitinating enzyme associated with the BRCA1 protein complex and it is involved in many cellular processes including regulation of the cell cycle and signaling pathways. Somatic BAP1 mutations have been seen frequently in malignant melanomas, uveal melanomas, and renal cell carcinomas. One study found inactivating BAP1 mutations in 47% of uveal melanomas.16

Patients with a germline BAP1 mutation can be followed with annual eye exams and frequent skin checks.11, 16 Low-dose computed tomography (CT) scan, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultrasound have been proposed as possible screening measures for lung and renal carcinomas however no consensus guidelines have been established.16

Familial Atypical Multiple Mole Melanoma Syndrome

Familial Atypical Multiple Mole Melanoma (FAMMM) is a dominant condition thought to account for 40% of familial melanoma,17 1% of single primary melanomas, and 3% of multiple primary melanomas (MPM).18 Features of FAMMM include numerous (usually > 50) atypical nevi and familial melanoma often at early ages of onset.19 The risk for melanoma varies based on geography and exposure to the sun with estimates ranging from 50% to over 90%.20 The lifetime risk for pancreatic cancer in individuals with FAMMM is increased,21 but can vary tremendously from 10% to over 60%.22 Individuals with numerous dysplastic nevi, MPM, or melanoma in the context of family history of melanoma and/or pancreatic cancer should be referred for testing. 23

FAMMM is caused by mutations in the CDKN2A gene, which disrupts the function of the p16 (INK4) isoform of the protein.24 This can lead to unregulated cell cycle progression from G1 to S phase and subsequent genomic instability that is critical in the pathogenesis of melanoma and pancreatic cancer.

Management of individuals with FAMMM has historically focused on patient education23 to limit sun exposure, quarterly dermatological exams often with digital dermoscopy, and vitamin D supplementation. Although pancreatic cancer screening has not demonstrated efficacy, surveillance options are available through both research studies and cancer centers that employ a combination of imaging and endoscopic ultrasound.23 The risk for pediatric melanoma and the opportunity to reduce risk by stringent sun protection should prompt assessment and testing of children in affected families.

Hereditary Leiomyomatosis and Renal Cell Cancer

Hereditary Leiomyomatosis and Renal Cell Cancer (HLRCC) is an autosomal dominant syndrome caused by mutations in the FH (fumarate hydratase) gene. HLRCC is characterized by cutaneous and uterine leiomyomas and renal tumors.25-27 Most individuals with HLRCC have >1 cutaneous leiomyoma, typically on their trunk and/or extremities. Uterine leiomyomas (fibroids) are present in virtually all women with HLRCC.26

While many women have uterine fibroids, HLRCC-associated leiomyomas are numerous, large, and on pathology show prominent nuclei or large orangeophilic nucleoli surrounded by a perinucleolar halo.25,26 HLRCC confers approximately a 15% lifetime risk of renal carcinoma, typically aggressive Type 2 papillary renal cell carcinomas, which often present as unilateral and solitary tumors.26,27 Cutaneous and uterine leiomyosarcoma have been reported but this risk is low. Individuals with multiple cutaneous leiomyomas (one histologically confirmed), individuals with Type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma, and individuals with a single cutaneous leiomyoma with a family history of kidney cancers and/or uterine leiomyomas should be referred to genetics.26

FH is a mitochondrial tumor suppressor gene that produces fumarase, the enzyme responsible for converting fumarate into malate in the citric acid cycle. Build up of fumarate impairs the degradation of hypoxia inducible factor HIF-1a resulting in a pseudo-hypoxic state that contributes to tumor development.28

Individuals found to carry a mutation can be followed with frequent dermatologic examinations as well as annual abdominal MRIs in children and adults. Women are followed with annual gynecological exams and may need myomectomy or hysterectomy for symptom management.26 Individuals with HLRCC are at risk to have a child with Fumarate Hydratase Deficiency (FHD) if their partner also carries an FH mutation. FHD is a severe autosomal recessive inborn error of metabolism.29

Cowden Syndrome

Cowden Syndrome (CS) is an autosomal dominant hereditary cancer syndrome that predisposes to multi-organ hamartomas and cancers.30 The most common cancers to develop in CS are hormone receptor positive breast cancers, follicular thyroid cancer, and endometrial cancers. Other CS-associated cancers are renal cell carcinomas and colorectal cancers.31,32 Benign features such as macrocephaly, biopsy proven tricholemmomas, gastrointestinal harmartomas/ganglioneuromas, and neurodevelopment issues are also features of CS.30 Testing for CS is indicated when individuals meet a number of criteria which entail a combination of benign, often pathognomonic features, and/or have component tumors of the disease.30 

PTEN gene mutations only account for 25% of individuals who meet CS clinical criteria.33 The PTEN protein functions both in the nucleus and cytoplasm to downregulate MAPK and PI3K/Akt.34, 35 CS cases without an identifiable PTEN mutation may be explained by methylation of KLLN, 36 mutations in other genes,37 or mosaicism.38

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Comprehensive (NCCN) has published recommendations for management of CS including: annual thyroid ultrasounds, breast MRIs and mammograms, as well as early and frequent colonoscopies.

Dermatological follow-up is often indicated and renal imaging has been proposed. Patients should be counseled regarding reproductive risks, which include risk for pediatric cancers in offspring as well as developmental delay and autism.39

von Hippel Lindau Disease

von Hippel Lindau (VHL) disease is an autosomal dominant hereditary cancer syndrome that is associated with a variety of tumors and cysts. The most common features of VHL syndrome are retinal angiomas, central nervous system (CNS) hemangioblastomas, and clear cell renal cell carcinomas (RCC).40,41 The lifetime risk of a CNS hemangioblastoma is 60% to 80% and the risk of RCC is 70%.40 Other features include pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas, pancreatic islet cells, endolymphatic sac tumors, epididymal cystadenomas, polycythemia (erythrocytosis), and cystadenomas of the broad ligaments of the uterus.40-45 Cysts, adenomas, and angiomas can also occur in the kidney, liver, pancreas, spleen and adrenal gland.40,41,43

Individuals who have a personal and/or family history of clear cell kidney cancer, pheochromocytoma and/or paraganglioma, cerebellar hemangioblastoma, or retinal angioma should be offered VHL genetic testing.46 About 90% of individuals with VHL syndrome develop at least one manifestation; however, there is wide variable expressivity.40,41,46 The tumors can occur in childhood or adulthood. 

VHL is a multifunctional gene with a strong gatekeeper role, especially in the kidney. When the VHL gene is mutated, the absence of HIF degradation results in abnormal accumulation of VEGF and other hypoxia-inducible mRNA leading to tumor and cyst development.41,46,47

Management for children and adults with VHL disease includes: annual physical exam, dilated eye exam, kidney evaluation with ultrasound, MRI exams of the brain, spine, and abdomen, including thin-slice MRI with contrast of the internal auditory canal, biochemical screening for pheochromocytomas, and annual audiology testing.46,48,49 Pregnant women with VHL need to be monitored closely due to the potential rapid growth of vascular tumors.50


DICER1 syndrome, BAP1 tumor predisposition syndrome, FAMMM, HLRCC, Cowden syndrome, and VHL are complex disorders with reduced penetrance and pleiotropic effects. It remains important for patients and providers to recognize the evolving nature of these syndromes and the inherent limitations in predicting age-specific risk of component cancers. As several of these syndromes are newly described and others exceedingly rare, management guidelines are often based on expert consensus rather than evidence-based outcome measures. Greater recognition of individuals with these syndromes and comprehensive, long-term follow-up studies are needed to determine the efficacy of various screening modalities and establish best practices.

The skills of a diverse set of medical providers including oncologists, pathologists, dermatologists, genetics professionals, and others are required for proper diagnosis and age appropriate risk management. Genetic counseling and testing can serve to provide an explanation for the development of cancers in a family and define risk for unaffected family members. Astute oncologists, through close collaboration with their genetics colleagues, are instrumental in identifying individuals with rare cancer syndromes to ensure that these patients–and their families–receive optimal care tailored to their specific genetic predispositions.

About the authors:

Affiliations: Carmelina E. Heydrich, MS, LGC, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Katherine A. Schneider, MPH, LGC, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Huma Q. Rana, MD, Clinical Director, Center for Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.

Corresponding author: Huma Q. Rana, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02115; phone: 617-632-6292; email: HumaQ_Rana@dfci.harvard.edu.


  1. Doros, L, Schultz, KA, Stewart, DR, et al: DICER1-Related Disorders. Initial posting: April 24, 2014. Pagon, RA, Adam, MP, Ardinger, HH et al, editors. GeneReviews (R) [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2014.
  2. Hill DA, Ivanovich J, Priest JR, et al. DICER1 mutations in familial pleuropulmonary blastoma. Science. 2009;325(5943):965.
  3. Schultz KA, Pacheco MC, Yang J, et al. Ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors, pleuropulmonary blastoma and DICER1 mutations: a report from the International Pleuropulmonary Blastoma Registry. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;122(2):246-50.
  4. Slade I, Bacchelli C, Davies H, et al. DICER1 syndrome: clarifying the diagnosis, clinical features and management implications of a pleiotropic tumour predisposition syndrome. J Med Genet. 2011;48(4):273-278.
  5. Priest JR, Williams GM, Manera R, et al. Ciliary body medulloepithelioma: four cases associated with pleuropulmonary blastoma: a report from the International Pleuropulmonary Blastoma Registry. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;95(7):1001-1005.
  6. Dehner LP, Jarzembowski JA, and Hill DA. Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma of the uterine cervix: a report of 14 cases and a discussion of its unusual clinicopathological associations. Mod Pathol. 2012;25(4):602-614.
  7. de Kock, L, Sabbaghian N, Plourde F, et al: Pituitary blastoma: a pathognomonic feature of germ-line DICER1 mutations. Acta Neuropathol. 2014;128(1): 111-122.
  8. de Kock L, Sabbaghian N, Soglio DB, et al: Exploring the association between DICER1 mutations and differentiated thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(6):E1072-1077.
  9. Foulkes WD, Bahubeshi A, Hamel N et al. Extending the phenotypes associated with DICER1 mutations. Hum Mutat. 2011; 32:1381-1384.
  10. Foulkes WD, Priest JR, Duchaine TF: DICER1: mutations, microRNAs and mechanisms. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14(10):662-672.
  11. Pilarski R, Cebulla CM, Massengill JB, et al. Expanding the clinical phenotype of hereditary BAP1 cancer predisposition syndrome, reporting three new cases. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2014; 53(2):177-182.
  12. Mural R, Wiesner T, Scolyer RA, et al. Tumours associated with BAP1 syndrome. Pathology. 2013; 45:116—126.
  13. Carbone M, Ferris LK, Baumann F, et al. BAP1 cancer syndrome: malignant mesothelioma, uveal and cutaneous melanoma, and MBAITs. J Transl Med. 2012;10:179.
  14. Martorano LM, Winkelmann RR, Cebulla CM, et al. Ocular melanoma and the BAP1 hereditary cancer syndrome: implications for the dermatologist. Int J Dermatol. 2014; 53(6):657-663.
  15. Njauw JC, Kim I, Piris A, et al. Germline BAP1 inactivation is preferentially associated with metastatic ocular melanoma and cutaneous-ocular melanoma families. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(4):e35295.
  16. Battaglia A. The importance of multidisciplinary approach in early detection of BAP1 tumor predisposition syndrome: clinical management and risk assessment. Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2014; 8:37-47.
  17. Goldstein AM, Chan M, Harland M, et al. High-risk melanoma susceptibility genes and pancreatic cancer, neural system tumors, and uveal melanoma across GenoMEL. Cancer Res. 2006;66(20):9818-9828.
  18. Berwick M1, Orlow I, Hummer AJ, et al. The prevalence of CDKN2A germ-line mutations and relative risk for cutaneous malignant melanoma: an international population-based study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(8):1520-1525.
  19. Lynch HT, Frichot BC 3rd, Lynch JF. Familial atypical multiple mole-melanoma syndrome. J Med Genet. 1978;15(5):352—356.
  20. Bishop DT, Demenais F, Goldstein AM, et al. Geographical variation in the penetrance of CDKN2A mutations for melanoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94(12):894-903.
  21. Goldstein AM, Fraser MC, Struewing JP, et al: Increased risk of pancreatic cancer in melanoma-prone kindreds with p16INK4 mutations. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:970-974.
  22. Vasen HF, Gruis NA, Frants RR. Risk of developing pancreatic cancer in families with familial atypical multiple mole melanoma associated with a specific 19 deletion of p16 (p16-Leiden). Int J Cancer. 2000;87(6):809-811.
  23. Eckerle Mize D, Bishop M, Resse E, et al. Familial Atypical Multiple Mole Melanoma Syndrome. In: Riegert-Johnson DL, Boardman LA, Hefferon T, et al., editors. Cancer Syndromes [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Center for Biotechnology Information (US); 2009. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK7030/.
  24. Hussussian CJ, Struewing JP, Goldstein AM, et al. Germline p16 mutations in familial melanoma. Nat Genet. 1994;8(1):15-21.
  25. Sanz-Ortega J, Vocke C, Stratton P, et al. Morphologic and molecular characteristics of uterine leiomyomas in hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cancer (HLRCC) syndrome. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013; 37(1):74-80.
  26. Schmidt LS, Linehan WM. Hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2014; 20(7):253-260.
  27. Menko FH, Maher ER, Schmidt LS, et al. Hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer (HLRCC): renal cancer risk, surveillance and treatment. Fam Cancer. 2014;13:637-644.
  28. King A, Selak MA, Gottlieb E. Succinate dehydrogenase and fumarate hydratase: linking mitochondrial dysfunction and cancer. Oncogene. 2006;25:4675-4682.
  29. Kerrigan JF, Aleck KA, Tarby TJ, et al. Fumaric aciduria: clinical and imaging features. Ann Neurol. 2000;47(5):583-588.
  30. Pilarski R, Burt R, Kohlman W, et al. Cowden syndrome and the PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome: systematic review and revised diagnostic criteria. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(21):1607-1616.
  31. Tan MH, Mester JL, Ngeow J, et al. Lifetime cancer risks in individuals with germline PTEN mutations. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(2):400-407.
  32. Bubien V, Bonnet F, Brouste V, et al. High cumulative risks of cancer in patients with PTEN hamartoma tumour syndrome. J Med Genet. 2013;50(4): 255-263.
  33. Tan MH, Mester J, Peterson C, et al. A clinical scoring system for selection of patients for PTEN mutation testing is proposed on the basis of a prospective study of 3042 probands. Am J Hum Genet. 2011;88(1):42-56.
  34. Liaw D, Marsh DJ, Li J, et al. Germline mutations of the PTEN gene in Cowden disease, an inherited breast and thyroid cancer syndrome. Nat Genet. 1997;16(1):64-67.
  35. Leslie NR, den Hertog J. Mutant PTEN in cancer: worse than nothing. Cell. 2014;157(3):527-529.
  36. Bennett KL, Mester J, Eng C. Germline epigenetic regulation of KILLIN in Cowden and Cowden-like syndrome. JAMA. 2010;304(24):2724-2731.
  37. Orloff MS, He X, Peterson C, et al. Germline PIK3CA and AKT1 mutations in Cowden and Cowden-like syndromes. Am J Hum Genet. 2013; 92(1):76-80.
  38. Pritchard CC, Smith C, Marushchak T, et al. A mosaic PTEN mutation causing Cowden syndrome identified by deep sequencing. Genet Med. 2013;15(12):1004-1007.
  39. Butler MG, Dasouki MJ, Zhou XP, et al. Subset of individuals with autism spectrum disorders and extreme macrocephaly associated with germline PTEN tumour suppressor gene mutations. J Med Genet. 2005;42:318-321.
  40. Maher ER, Yates JR, Harries R, et al. Clinical features and natural history of von Hippel-Lindau disease. Quart J Med. 1990;77:1151-1163.
  41. Maher ER, Neumann HP, and Richard S. Von Hippel-Lindau disease: A clinical and scientific review. Eur J Hum Genet. 2011;19(6):617-623.
  42. Richard S, David P, Marsot-Dupuch K, et al. Central nervous system hemangioblastomas, endolymphatic sac tumors, and von Hippel-Lindau disease. Neurosurg Rev. 2000;23(1):1-22.
  43. Bausch B, Jilg C, Glasker S, et al. Renal cancer in von Hippel-Lindau disease and related syndromes. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2013;9(9):529-538.
  44. Charlesworth M, Verbeke CS, Falk GA, et al. Pancreatic lesions in von Hippel-Lindau disease? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of the literature. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(7):1422-1428.
  45. Gordeuk VR, Serqueeva AI, Miasnikova GY, et al. Congenital disorder of oxygen sensing: association of the homozygous Chuvash polycythemia VHL mutation with thrombosis and vascular abnormalities but not tumors. Blood. 2004;103(10):3924-3932.
  46. Frantzen C, Links TP, Giles RH. Von Hippel-Lindau disease. Updated posting: June 21, 2012. Pagon RA, Adam MP, Ardinger HH et al, editors. GeneReviews (R) [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2014.
  47. Richard S, Gardie B, Couve S, et al. Von Hippel-Lindau: how a rare disease illuminates cancer biology. Semin Cancer Biol. 2013;23(1):26-37.
  48. Poulsen ML, Gimsing S, Kosteljanetz M, et al. von Hippel-Lindau disease: surveillance strategy for endolymphatic sac tumors. Genet Med Dec; 2011;13(12):1032-1041.
  49. Vaganovs P, Bokums, K, Miklasevics, E, et al. Von hippel-lindau syndrome: diagnosis and management of hemangioblastoma and pheochromocytoma. Case Rep Urol. 2013;2013:624096. doi: 10.1155/2013/624096. Epub 2013 May 23.
  50. Frantzen C, Kruizinga RC, van Assett SJ, et al: Pregnancy-related hemangioblastoma progression and complications in von Hippel-Lindau disease. Neurology. 2012;79(8):793-798.