News >

Biosimilars Among Several Measures Needed to Lower Oncology Costs

Brandon Scalea
Published: Tuesday, Oct 30, 2018

Kashyap Patel, MD

Kashyap Patel, MD

The rising issue of drug prices is going to take time to resolve, but there are cost-effective strategies oncologists can practice in the meantime, said Kashyap Patel, MD.

at the 2018 NCODA Fall Summit, Patel discussed biosimilars and other potential cost-controlling measures in cancer care.

OncLive: What cost-effective strategies should oncologists implement?

Patel: People keep talking about the drugs as a big part of the cost. But when you look at multiple studies, there are other areas that are low-hanging fruit in healthcare that can be addressed a lot more quickly. First of all, when you look at unnecessary hospitalization, this is something that can be reduced. We can see patients only when they need to be seen. That is one component of cost that has not been discussed.

There are some areas where steps can definitely be taken to bring in new strategies. Of course, we don't want to hurt innovation. Drug prices are always a challenge, but they bring in innovation. Without innovation, we would not be able to cure cancer. There are simple practices that can become priority to addressing drug prices.

Do you think biosimilars will soon play a bigger role in oncology?

Oh, now you are going to get me going. How much time do we have? Biosimilars are actually my favorite topic. I testified in front of the FDA about 2 weeks ago in terms of ODAC to support approved biosimilars. These are the real solution to driving down drug prices. If you have one possible solution for the future, it is biosimilars.

But there are challenges—payers do not recognize their role and our patent litigation system is conducted in a way that even if biosimilars are approved, they are sometimes delayed by 6 to 9 months. At the end of the day, biosimilars definitely position themselves as a very rational and realistic strategy.

How should the skepticism associated with biosimilars be addressed?

For those who are purists in science, if you look at the manufacturing process of the biologics—I am talking about the originators—if they were manufactured in, say, 2004, it is different from today. The current version of an originator drug is a biosimilar of itself. When you have the batch-to-batch variation and the process has evolved in manufacturing, if we are not worried about change of the same drug, why are we worried about biosimilars? They are just one more new biologic.

In addition, the FDA has put together a very strong process called the Totality of Evidence standard, so they review the clinical efficacy, molecular similarities, and tolerability of these agents. This ensures the equivalence of biosimilars.

Will biosimilars be more impactful globally as opposed to in the United States?

It is not just globally, I think biosimilars will even become more prominent in the United States. If we continue to see the growth of biologics and an increased number of patients living longer, we will have to face the problem of biologics alone. In Europe, they market biosimilars very well. I think we are getting there in the United States. Importantly, I think the system might be unsustainable if biosimilars do not succeed in our country.

... to read the full story
To Read the Full Story

View Conference Coverage
Online CME Activities
TitleExpiration DateCME Credits
Publication Bottom Border
Border Publication