News >

Considerations for CAR T-Cell Therapy in NHL

Angelica Welch
Published: Friday, Jan 19, 2018

Babis Andreadis, MD
Babis Andreadis, MD
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy exploded onto the scene in 2017 with the approval of tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah) in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel; Yescarta) in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).

Tisagenlecleucel was the first FDA-approved CAR T-cell therapy, and one that is indicated for the treatment of patients up to 25 years of age with B-cell precursor ALL that is refractory or in second or later relapse. The approval came following the advice of the FDA’s Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee, which voted 10-0 in July 2017 to recommend approval.

Axi-cel was approved in October of 2017 for the treatment of adults with relapsed or refractory NHL. This approval was based on the single-arm ZUMA-1 study, in which axi-cel demonstrated an objective response rate of 82% and a complete response rate of 54%. In an interview during the 2017 OncLive® State of the Science SummitTM on Hematologic Malignancies, Babis Andreadis, MD, associate professor of clinical medicine, Department of Medicine, director, Clinical Research Support Office, University of California, San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, reflected on the successes seen with CAR T-cell development in the past year and the use of CAR T-cell therapy in patients with NHL.

OncLive: Please provide an overview of your presentation on CAR T-cell therapy in NHL.

Andreadis: We are living in an exciting era in lymphoma therapy because of the recent developments in immunotherapy, specially CAR T-cell therapies. In 2017, we saw the approval of 2 novel therapies in patients with ALL and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. My talk focused on how these therapies work and what are the expected management complications and toxicities associated with them. In the lymphoma sphere, we know that both therapies can produce 30% to 40% long-term responders, meaning people who are out 6 months or more with a complete response. The goal is to determine whether those patients can be seen as longer-term responders and eventually be cured. We think CAR T-cell therapy has the ability to do that.

Currently, it is only available in specialized centers because of the ramifications and toxicities involved with the treatment. We are seeing a big increase in our referral patterns to accommodate those patients, and all major centers across the country are doing that. 

The main toxicities with the treatment have to do with 2 broad spheres, one being cytokine release syndrome (CRS), which usually presents with fever, low blood pressure, low oxygen levels, and organ toxicity; it usually happens in the first week. The other short-term toxicities are anything from confusion to inability to speak, to disorientation, to tremors, and even a coma. These usually happen in the first week and can last a little longer than CRS. Therefore, the physicians in centers who are doing this therapy need to be educated and trained in order to safely administer the therapy. Once this acute phase is over—about 1 month—most patients can return back to their local physicians. The long-term side effects are manageable. Those can be low blood count—and may need transfusion support—as well as needing to have hypervigilance about infections. 

This great era that we have been waiting for is here, and we now have a therapy that works for patients who don't have any other options.

How have you noticed the approvals of axicabtagene and tisagenlecleucel impacting the treatment landscape?

We have seen a big uptake in referrals. People with large cell lymphoma have a great chance at cure. Frontline treatment cures 60% to 70% of patients, and if they relapse, second-line treatment cures about 25% of patients. Historically, patients who don't respond to the second-line treatment have no options, and their 1-year survival rates are somewhere around 10%.

Therefore, these patients would not have been referred to major centers, historically; they would have been managed locally and in a palliative manner. However, now we are seeing all of these patients being referred because they believe there is finally an option that can work. Everyone has a good chance.

Will we ever reach a point where this therapy could be implemented widely across the country?

There are some parts to it that we are being careful about. The structure of the treatment is much like a stem cell transplant in that you need a stem cell collection, the manufacturer, the intravenous administration, and toxicity monitoring. Therefore, the structure of the treatment requires a lot of resources that the average community practice does not employ.

View Conference Coverage
Online CME Activities
TitleExpiration DateCME Credits
Community Practice Connections™: Addressing Post-Transplant Obstacles: Current and Emerging Strategies to Evolve the Standard of Care for Patients With Graft-Versus-Host DiseaseMar 28, 20192.0
2017 Year in Review™: Clinical Impact of Immunotherapies in the Treatment of CancerMar 30, 20191.75
Publication Bottom Border
Border Publication