News >

Elotuzumab Triplet Yields High Response Rate in High-Risk Smoldering MM

Wayne Kuznar
Published: Monday, Dec 12, 2016

Irene Ghobrial, MD

Irene Ghobrial, MD

The combination of elotuzumab (Empliciti), lenalidomide (Revlimid), and dexamethasone has excellent activity and is well-tolerated in the treatment of high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), providing hope that it can delay or even halt progression to MM. Results of a phase II trial of this combination revealed an overall response rate (ORR) in excess of 80% in high-risk SMM on the basis of newly defined criteria,1 said Irene Ghobrial, MD, who presented the data at the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting.

Patients with SMM are a heterogeneous group who have a risk of progression to MM of about 10% per year, “yet we know that some of those patients who are high-risk smoldering myeloma patients are the ones who have a high chance of progression of 50% over 2 years,” said Ghobrial, attending physician, Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. In this latter group, the possibility to prevent progression through early therapeutic intervention is intriguing.

The appeal to early therapy is inhibition of clonal evolution, possibly enabling cure. “These patients also have a very good immune system, and therefore immunotherapy…could be very appealing because it could potentially cure those patient in the early stages,” she said.

A significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) was realized with the combination of lenalidomide and dexamethasone in high-risk SMM compared with observation, and the response rate in the first induction phase (before maintenance) was 79%.2

She and colleagues therefore sought to determine whether early therapeutic intervention with elotuzumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in patients with high-risk SMM could prevent or delay time to progression to overt MM, given the activity of lenalidomide/dexamethasone in patients with high-risk MM and the proven safety and activity profile of the combination of elotuzumab and lenalidomide in patients with relapsed MM.

The primary objective was to determine the proportion of high-risk SMM patients who are progression-free at 2 years after receiving the triplet. “The 2-year time point was picked because we know that high-risk SMM patients in general have a 50% chance of progression at 2 years,” she said. The trial was originally designed with 2 arms, with one using high-dose dexamethasone and the other using low-dose dexamethasone. The latter arm was closed after enrolling just 10 patients due to similar activity and toxicity to high-dose dexamethasone based on published data demonstrating that high-dose dexamethasone, given once weekly, does not have a detrimental effect on the immune system in patients with SMM.

The 51 patients enrolled in the phase II trial met eligibility for high-risk SMM based on the newly defined criteria proposed by Rajkumar et al. At the time of the presentation, 47 patients were evaluable. The median age of patients was 63 years, the median bone marrow plasma cells was 20%, and the median number of treatment cycles completed was 8, with a range of 1 to 23 cycles. Thirty-eight percent of these patients had high-risk cytogenetics.

Overall, the combination was well-tolerated, with only 2 patients experiencing grade 4 toxicity (1 with thrombocytopenia and 1 with neutropenia, both of which were reversible). Only 1 patient had an infusion reaction. No patient discontinued therapy due to toxicity, and only 4 dose reductions were required, 3 of which were in the maintenance phase.

Among the 23 patients who completed at least 9 cycles of therapy, the complete response rate was 8.7%, the rate of very good partial response was 26.1%, and the rate of partial response was 47.8%, for an ORR response rate of 82.6%. The clinical benefit rate was 100%. Most patients achieved a response by the second cycle.

Early data indicate PFS may be better than lenalidomide/dexamethasone, but “we need long-term follow-up to determine PFS as well as whether those patients indeed would have delayed end-organ and delayed myeloma events,” said Ghobrial. “We’re looking now at immune profiling and mechanisms of response to see, indeed, who are those patients who have a deep response, and whether that correlates with certain immune profiling in those patients.”
  1. Ghobrial IM, Badros AZ, Vredenburgh JJ, et al. Phase II trial of combination of elotuzumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma. Presented at: American Society of Hematology 58th Annual Meeting; December 3-6, 2016; San Diego, CA. Abstract 976.
  2. Mateos MV, Hernandez MT, Giraldo P, et al. Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone for high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2013;369:438-447.

View Conference Coverage
Online CME Activities
TitleExpiration DateCME Credits
Cancer Summaries and Commentaries™: Update from Atlanta: Advances in the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic LeukemiaFeb 28, 20190.5
Community Practice Connections™: 2nd Annual International Congress on Immunotherapies in Cancer™: Focus on Practice-Changing ApplicationFeb 28, 20192.0
Publication Bottom Border
Border Publication