Michael J. Pishvaian, MD, PhD
In a study of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who harbor NTRK
fusions, investigators evaluated the selective TRK and ROS1 inhibitor entrectinib, which is both potent and active in patients with CNS metastases, where results showed early signs of antitumor activity.
, Pishvaian, director of the Phase I Clinical Program, co-director of the Ruesch Center Pancreatic Cancer Program Medical Oncology, Otto J. Ruesch Center for the Cure of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, discussed the findings with entrectinib in this population, as well as the potential implications of widespread molecular testing in pancreatic cancer.
OncLive: Can you provide some background on this study?
: Patients with pancreatic cancer obviously have limited therapeutic options. We know that chemotherapy can be of benefit—we all use chemotherapy regularly, but we are certainly looking for something better. There is a relatively small population of patients who have defined molecular actionable alterations, although that list is growing. There are no approved therapies that are targeted to metastatic pancreatic cancer, except for the small subgroup of patients who are known to have microsatellite instability-high pancreatic cancer, for which pembrolizumab (Keytruda) may be of benefit.
fusion was identified, there is potential for significant benefit from single-agent therapy. It suggests that this was a sort of a driving mutation of the cancer.
What were the findings of this early study?
We found 3 patients, 2 of whom had NTRK
fusions, and 1 with a ROS1
rearrangement; entrectinib is also active against ALK
rearrangements. Given that this drug targets those specific rearrangements or fusions and their downstream pathways, this drug was used in these 3 patients. It was very well tolerated, in fact, in at least 1 patient who was very sick going into this study, they had a significant improvement in their quality of life. For all of the patients in general, there was at least a maintenance of a high level of quality of life.
For 2 of the 3 patients, there was a response in their disease, and in 1 patient there was long-term stabilization of disease. While this wasn't compared with chemotherapy, the response in this small subgroup of patients was certainly a better outcome than what we typically see in patients who receive chemotherapy. What are the implication of these findings for the future treatment of pancreatic cancer? It means that we are actually finding new things to treat patients with—we just have to go looking for them. This was a very small subgroup of patients, it would only be found with these extensive molecular profiling efforts. In fact, some of the standard molecular profiling next-generation sequencing DNA tests don't even identify these fusions. It is really an RNA-based test that is the best way to go about looking for these fusions.
Therefore, it means that you have to go looking for it. However, it also means that when you find these driver mutations, even in a small subgroup of patients, [they can] benefit from [targeted agents]. It dramatically improves their quality of life and probably expand their quantity of life, although we can't say that definitively. We can offer great benefit to these patients.
... to read the full story