James Urbanic, MD
Incorporating radiotherapy into the treatment of patients with oligometastatic or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is standard practice, but its optimal placement in the paradigm is less clear with the advent of immunotherapy and other treatment advances, said James Urbanic, MD.
State of the Science Summit™ on Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer, Urbanic, associate professor of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, discussed the evolving role of radiotherapy in patients with oligometastatic and metastatic NSCLC.
OncLive: Please provide an overview of your presentation.
: I spoke about when we should use radiation treatment in metastatic NSCLC, particularly in the setting in which a patient might have 1 to 3 relatively small metastases. Historically, chemotherapy has had modest effectiveness. Initially, surgeons pioneered this idea of taking out a few small metastatic sites. As radiation treatment has gotten better over the past number of years, we have gotten better at picking off small areas of disease with very high-dose radiation treatments.
We now have the opportunity to control those spots 9 out of 10 times. As chemotherapy is getting better, it makes more sense to integrate the use of radiation treatment into the patients’ overall treatment plan. Some of those patients with small amounts of metastatic disease have particularly long and durable survival rates.
What is the prevalence of patients with oligometastatic disease?
They are fairly common, but there are multiple types of them. There are some patients who have a small line of brain metastases and no other systemic sites. There are other patients who have 2 or 3 sites throughout the body. For the radiation oncologist, it depends in part on the referral base and the acceptance of looking at a local therapy as a good treatment rationale for these patients. This is in terms of how many patients I'll see in any given year. Clearly, over the past number of years, we are seeing more and more of these [types of] patients.
How have techniques evolved?
Radiation techniques are all about stereotactic radiosurgery, given in either 1 treatment or a short course of 1 to 5 treatments. What that means is trying to give a very high dose to the tumor itself in a very steep, rapid-dose gradient, or fall off from the high-dose area to the low-dose area. You're treating the tumor itself with the lethal dose of radiation to those cells. Those techniques are being further refined. There are some limitations to how much more you can refine x-rays.
Has tolerability with radiation therapy improved?
It's all location dependent. There are many patients we can treat for a very small target; those patients have very limited risk. As we start treating more sites, larger tumors, and disease in parts of the body that don't have a lot of redundancy, the risk goes up. For example, if you treat a metastasis in the brain stem, that patient is going to have a fairly high risk of toxicity. If you treat a tumor in the main stem bronchus, you have a risk of causing injury to that part of the lung; that has a high risk of serious toxicity. For the most part, risks are fairly limited for many small and isolated tumors.
Will radiation become more of a multimodality approach?
Yeah, it is pretty interesting. A lot of the trials that were done recently on radiation in oligometastatic lung cancer were done in the era of maintenance chemotherapy. In a couple randomized phase II trials, we looked at maintenance therapy alone or maintenance therapy plus consolidation radiation treatment. The data are pretty promising. The progression-free survival was clearly longer in both The University of Texas Southwestern study and in The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center study.
... to read the full story