News >

Pomalidomide Effective in Multiple Myeloma With Renal Impairment

Jason Harris
Published: Monday, Feb 19, 2018

Meletios Dimopoulos, MD
Meletios Dimopoulos, MD
Pomalidomide (Pomalyst) in combination with low-dose dexamethasone induced an overall response rate (ORR) of up to 39% in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with renal impairment (RI), according to phase II study findings published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

“Results presented here add to the limited body of evidence of treatment options for patients with advanced stages of multiple myeloma and RI and will help healthcare providers make appropriate treatment choices for this patient population,” lead author Meletios Dimopoulos, MD, chair of clinical therapeutics at the University of Athens in Greece, and coinvestigators wrote.

From February 2014 to July 2016, 81 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and RI were enrolled into MM-013, a multicenter, open-label, noncomparative, phase II study conducted at 18 sites across 8 countries in Europe.

Eligible adult patients had a documented diagnosis of multiple myeloma and measurable disease by M-protein or serum free light chain levels. Patients must have received at least 1 antimyeloma regimen, including lenalidomide (Revlimid), and documented progression per International Myeloma Working Group criteria during or after their last antimyeloma treatment. All patients were required to have impaired renal function with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 according to the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation.

Investigators assigned patients to 1 of 3 renal cohorts: cohort A (moderate RI; eGFR 30 to <45 mL/min/1.73 m2; n = 33); cohort B (severe RI; eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2; n = 34); and cohort C: severe RI requiring hemodialysis (n = 14).

All patients received pomalidomide at 4 mg/day on days 1 to 21 of 28-day cycles. Patients aged ≤75 years received 40 mg of dexamethasone, and those over 75 years received 20 mg of dexamethasone on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Thromboprophylaxis was mandatory for patients who did not require hemodialysis and used for patients on hemodialysis when appropriate and feasible.

The median age for the overall population was 72 years (range, 52-86). The majority of patients (81.5%) were aged 65 years or older and male (60.5%). Median time from multiple myeloma diagnosis to enrollment was 3.8 years (range, 0.5-19.4). Most patients had chronic (>1 month) renal insufficiency, with a median duration of renal insufficiency before study enrollment of 24.7 months in cohort A, 40.4 months in cohort B, and 9.4 months in cohort C.

Patients in cohort C had higher involved sFLC levels than did patients in cohorts A and B. Overall, patients received a median of 4 prior antimyeloma regimens. All patients had received prior lenalidomide treatment and 97.5% had received prior bortezomib (Velcade). Approximately 25% of patients underwent prior stem cell transplantation.

ORR was 39.4% with a median duration of response (DoR) of 14.7 months in cohort A compared with 32.4% and a median DoR of 4.6 months in cohort B, and 14.3% and a median DoR that was not reached in cohort C. More than half (51.5%) of patients in cohort A derived clinical benefit compared with 41.2% in cohort B, and 21.4% in cohort C.

Ten of the 14 patients in cohort C had their response assessed by M-protein (serum or urine) levels and 3 by sFLC levels. Among these patients, 57.1% had stable disease and 78.6% had disease control.

In patients who had a partial response or greater, median time to response was 0.99 months in cohort A, 0.95 months in cohort B, and 1.91 months in cohort C.

Prior therapy (odds ratio [OR], 3.25; 95% CI, 1.03-10.25; P = .0438) and time since diagnosis (OR, 3.65; 95% CI, 1.17-11.43; P = .0260) were identified as significant predictors of myeloma response in multivariable analysis.

With a median follow-up duration of 4.6 months, median progression-free survival was 6.5 months in cohort A compared with 4.2 months in cohort B and 2.4 months in cohort C. Median time to progression was 6.2 months overall, and 8.3 months, 5.5 months, and 4.0 months in cohorts A, B, and C, respectively. With a median follow-up duration of 8.6 months, median OS was 16.4 months, 11.8 months, and 5.2 months in cohorts A, B, and C, respectively.

As of the January 28, 2017, data cutoff, 13 patients were still on treatment—7 in cohort A, 5 in cohort B, and 1 in cohort C. A total of 68 patients discontinued treatment, mostly because of progressive disease (39 patients; 48.1%).

A total of 23 patients (28.4%) died during treatment, which was defined as death on or after the date of first study drug dose and within 28 days of the last study drug dose. Myeloma progression was the most common cause of death, with plasma cell myeloma reported in 5 patients overall.

View Conference Coverage
Online CME Activities
TitleExpiration DateCME Credits
Community Practice Connections™: 14th Annual International Symposium on Melanoma and Other Cutaneous Malignancies®Apr 30, 20192.0
Oncology Consultations®: The Advancing Role of CAR T-Cell Therapies in Hematologic MalignanciesApr 30, 20191.5
Publication Bottom Border
Border Publication