Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy Ideal for Some Breast Cancer Patients

Tony Hagen @oncobiz
Published: Saturday, Mar 10, 2018

Hyman B. Muss, MD
Hyman B. Muss, MD
Endocrine therapy can achieve tumor reduction for patients with ER-positive breast cancer, possibly avoiding the need for chemotherapy or even surgery in some patients; however, deciding how long to continue this therapy can be tricky, said Hyman B. Muss, MD, who presented at the 2018 Miami Breast Cancer Conference®.

“It can improve the probability of breast preservation for women who would appropriately fit in [related] studies and don’t have very high-grade or aggressive tumors,” said Muss, of the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, and a 2017 Giants of Cancer Care® winner. “The optimal duration is 3 to 6 months. I think it’s [also] worth considering this in postmenopausal women with larger tumors.”

“A lot of studies compare primary treatment with drugs—like tamoxifen—with surgery in operable candidates, and suffice it to say that now, with long-term data, although surgery is better for controlling local disease, overall survival is the same,” he said. Not only is endocrine therapy potentially very helpful in shrinking tumors, it’s also very effective as adjuvant therapy, Muss added.

Based on available evidence, the current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines indicate that preoperative endocrine therapy alone may be considered for patients with ER-positive disease, based on comorbidities or low-risk luminal status.

In a randomized phase II trial, neoadjuvant endocrine therapy has shown similar efficacy as chemotherapy in 239 patients.1 A partial response (PR) was achieved in roughly 65% of patients in both groups and 10% had no palpable mass, with no statistically significant difference between the groups. “And these are all stage 2B, 3B, and 3A patients,” Muss said.

For breast conservation, data favored endocrine therapy (33% vs 24%). Pathological complete response (pCR) percentages were low—6% for endocrine therapy versus 3% for chemotherapy—but “very few of these patients get pCRs,” Muss said. “When I talk about neoadjuvant and endocrine therapy in hormone receptor–positive patients, I don’t build up the pCR as such an important thing, because then when you don’t get it, patients are petrified,” he said.

It’s often unclear how much preoperative endocrine therapy should be used before resorting to more aggressive treatment. “The real question on this—the frequently asked question—is if you do it, how long should you give it, and how will you know when to bail out early?”

A study co-authored by Michael J. Dixon, MD,2 could help answer the duration question, Muss noted. In the 182-patient trial, clinical complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) rates at 3 months were 70% with neoadjuvant letrozole. After 3 months, 63 patients elected to continue letrozole. These patients achieved an 84% CR+PR rate. From there, 33 women at a mean age of 83 years remained on letrozole. At 3 years, median time to treatment failure had not been reached.

“A lot of older people did great on this neoadjuvant therapy and then stayed on it without surgery, so I would say that you need at least 3 to 4 months, but one of the seminal trials that we’re doing to help us with the chemotherapy question is 6 months. It’s tough for a lot of patients to take a little pill with a mass in their breast that they can feel and wait 6 months for surgery. You’ve got to cheer them along,” Muss said.

In a study reported in 2008, the Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index (PEPI) was used to determine how relapse risk could help with decisions about additional treatment options for patients who have received neoadjuvant endocrine therapy.3 Investigators concluded that patients with breast cancer with pathological stage 1 or 0 disease and a PEPI score of 0 were at very low risk of relapse and unlikely to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

“They looked at relapsed survival at 5 years and these data were very impressive by the PEPI scores. But very few of these patients had pCR, pathologically, so it’s a very skewed group, but this scoring system worked impressively well,” Muss said. PEPI, Allred, and Ki67 scoring results indicate that “you don’t have to rush. If you have these grade-1, hormone-receptive tumors, they’re more likely to respond, and this is verified by genomic assays and other assays.”

References

  1. Semiglazov VF, Semiglazov VV, Dashyan GA, et al. Phase 2 randomized trial of primary endocrine therapy versus chemotherapy in postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Cancer. 2007;110(2):244-254. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22789.
  2. Dixon JM, Renshaw L, Macaskill EJ, et al. Increase in response rate by prolonged treatment with neoadjuvant letrozole. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;113(1):145-151. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-9915-6.
  3. Ellis MJ, Tao Y, Luo J, A'Hern R. Outcome prediction for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer based on postneoadjuvant endocrine therapy tumor characteristics. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(19):1380-1388. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn309.



View Conference Coverage
Online CME Activities
TitleExpiration DateCME Credits
Community Practice Connections™: CDK4/6 Inhibitors With the Experts: The Role of Emerging Agents for the Management of Metastatic Breast CancerMay 30, 20182.0
Medical Crossfire®: Clinical Updates on PARP Inhibition and its Evolving Use in the Treatment of CancersMay 30, 20181.5
Publication Bottom Border
Border Publication
x