
Opinion|Videos|December 12, 2024
CDK4/6 Inhibitors Treatment Options in the eBC Setting
Author(s)Kevin Kalinsky, MD, MS, Virginia Kaklamani, MD
Panelists discuss how the NCCN guidelines for risk stratification in HR+/HER2– early-stage breast cancer (eBC) guide clinical decision-making, exploring real-world adherence to these guidelines, the complexity of risk stratification in various clinical scenarios, and the role of clinical factors, biomarkers, and advanced testing methodologies (including RSClin N+, next-generation sequencing [NGS], fluorescence in situ hybridization [FISH], immunohistochemistry [IHC], and circulating DNA [ctDNA]) in defining “high-risk” patients and guiding treatment strategies.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Video content above is prompted by the following:
- Please briefly describe the predominant role of CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR+/HER2– early breast cancer treatment.
- Given your experience and the positive trials in the metastatic setting, how comfortable are you with using CDK4/6 inhibitors in eBC?
- Can you provide an overview of the current landscape of treatment options for HR+/HER2– eBC?
- What are the limitations of current treatments?
- How are newer strategies like adjuvant CDK4/6 and PARP inhibitors changing the paradigm?
- What is the rationale for combining CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy in early-stage HR+/HER2– breast cancer?
Advertisement
Latest CME
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on OncLive
1
Long-Term Cilta-Cel Data Show Low Rates of PFS Events in Standard-Risk R/R Myeloma
2
FDA Updates Axi-Cel Label to Remove Limitation of Use in R/R PCNSL
3
Real-World Data Support Clinical Benefit With Lifileucel in Previously Treated Advanced Melanoma
4
Nonresponse to Bridging Therapy and Peak ALC After Cilta-Cel Are Associated With Neurotoxicity, NRM in Myeloma
5

































