
Opinion|Videos|December 18, 2024
Clinical Decision-Making for a Patient With eBC: Scenario and Strategies
Author(s)Kevin Kalinsky, MD, MS, Virginia Kaklamani, MD
Panelists discuss how differences in trial designs, including inclusion criteria, dosing, and end points, influence clinical decision-making in the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors for HR+/HER2– early breast cancer (eBC), with a focus on the NATALEE trial’s analysis of patients with no or low nodal involvement, and how recent expanded approval of ribociclib for high-risk node-positive and node-negative eBC patients guides the identification of ideal candidates based on clinical factors.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Video content above is prompted by the following:
- Please describe notable differences in the trial designs or analyses (eg, inclusion criteria, dosing, end points) with these CDK4/6 inhibitors in eBC.
- How do these differences impact your clinical decision-making?
- The latest NATALEE trial analysis (N0 subgroup) examines patients with no or low nodal involvement; can you please describe your experience with this patient population?
- With the recent expanded approval of ribociclib for node-positive and node-negative HR+/HER2– eBC patients with a high risk of recurrence, what patient characteristics or clinical factors make someone an ideal candidate for adjuvant ribociclib?
Advertisement
Latest CME
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on OncLive
1
Long-Term Cilta-Cel Data Show Low Rates of PFS Events in Standard-Risk R/R Myeloma
2
FDA Updates Axi-Cel Label to Remove Limitation of Use in R/R PCNSL
3
Real-World Data Support Clinical Benefit With Lifileucel in Previously Treated Advanced Melanoma
4
Nonresponse to Bridging Therapy and Peak ALC After Cilta-Cel Are Associated With Neurotoxicity, NRM in Myeloma
5

































